Posted on 01/09/2017 10:06:01 PM PST by grundle
A new study on racial integration in the United States that ranked all states and the District of Columbia based on 16 key indicators of equality and integration shows seven out of 10 of the most integrated voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 election.
Financial advice website WalletHub published 2017s States with the Most Racial Progress to determine the most racially integrated and progressive states based on employment and wealth, education and civic engagement, and health.
We evaluated those dimensions using 16 relevant metrics , according to the sites methodology. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, with 100 representing the highest level of racial integration and progress.
The top 10 states on WalletHubs racial integration ranking from first to 10th include: Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Texas, Delaware, Nevada, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Montana and Tennessee. Results of the 2016 election show all of those states with the exception of Hawaii, Delaware and Nevada, voted to elect Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at theamericanmirror.com ...
Nevada mote than likely voted for Trump, but the Reid machine in Clark County had one last gasp in 2016, soon to be dead.
Not ‘mote’ but ‘more’. :)
And a super majority of countries.
HOORAY Americans
Trump won 7 of the 10 most ‘integrated states because that is where the whites and productive citizens have experience the most sever anti-white, state-sponsored violence and government oppression/”reverse” racism.
Very interesting! Just watched Clemson beat Bama. I guess I am no longer an artist, I watch football. Meryl Streep says so. I guess my Chinese brush paintings don’t count. LOL.
This will only become more true. Progressives, when it get down to it, really don’t like to live next to minorities. Their way to get them to leave is through raising the property values in the area. Raising the minimum wage will have the same effects. The longer progressives live in an area, the more white it becomes.
As i recall, NV had two blue counties, Las Vegas and Reno. The rest of the counties were red.
Regentrification. I have seen that in Houston, Austin, and Claremont Ca.
No. Trump won those states because Russians dispatched the messages being communicated regarding the hidden corruption, theft, pay to play, money laundering, and evil of the democrat party in their own words.
Hooray Russians. Doing the job American journalists are paid not to do. For free.
California ( for one) has “motor Voter”, in other words if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote, and ALL illegal aliens are given full drivers license privileges, so I guess Trump was correct. I think Oregon , Washington and Nevada are “motor voter” too.
How Mexicans get fake citizenship in california is that they can take a temporary matricual Consular vistor card to the DMV , pass the driving test and get a California driver license and they are in. Just renew the license every year and they have every privilege of any US citizen, and are immune from being challenged by authorities on citizenship
Went to Boston and to Salem for Halloween. I thought I was at an Aryan Convention. I saw very few minorities. The people that waited on you were all white. Amazing.
Montana?
White alone, percent, July 1, 2015 89.2%
Black or African American alone, percent, July 1, 2015, 0.6%
Hispanic or Latino, percent, July 1, 2015, 3.6%
every privilege of any US citizen
I want to compliment you on proper choice of words. Too often both our side and the other side confuse rights with privileges.
If “racial integration/diversity” is to be used as a selling point in the election results, by either side, the rankings do not actually help. While it is true that Trump won 7 of the top 10 of the “most” “racially integrated states”, and he won 15 of the top 25, he also won a majority, 14, of the bottom 25 of “least” “racially integrated” states.
What the data ACTUALLY show is still a refutation of the “racist” claim. “Racial integration” was not a factor, as Trump’s wins seem to NOT be dependent on that factor. His wins span the rankings from most to least, and cannot be said to be more in one end of it than the other.
Those are all the Dems need to win, considering that together they contain 90% of the state’s population. Republicans can win the state if they only lose Clark, but not if they lose both.
Yes, and that’s a shame.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.