Posted on 12/09/2016 8:40:58 PM PST by DIRTYSECRET
Let’s relocate a bunch of government agencies to the Midwest Time to shift economic activity from the overcrowded coasts to places that need more of it. Updated by Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesiasmatt@vox.com Dec 9, 2016, 8:30am EST TWEET
SHARE
Cleveland rocks! Photo by Mike Lawrie/Getty Images America’s post-industrial Midwest is far from being the country’s poorest region. To find the direst economic conditions in the United States, one generally has to look toward Appalachia, the Mississippi Delta region, the Rio Grande Valley, and a smattering of heavily Native American counties in the Southwest and Great Plains. What the Midwest’s recent economic struggles bring, however, is not just large-scale political salience but a particular kind of fixability.
The poorest places in the United States have been poor for a very long time and lack the basic infrastructure of prosperity. But that’s not true in the Midwest, where cities were thriving two generations ago and where an enormous amount of infrastructure is in place. Midwestern states have acclaimed public university systems, airports that are large enough to serve as major hubs, and cities whose cultural legacies include major league pro sports teams, acclaimed museums, symphonies, theaters, and other amenities of big-city living.
New Money logo This article is part of New Money, a new section on economics, technology, and business. But industrial decline has left these cities overbuilt, with shrunken populations that struggle to support the legacy infrastructure, and the infrastructure’s decline tends to only beget further regional decline.
At the same time, America’s major coastal cities are overcrowded. They suffer from endemic housing scarcity, massive traffic congestion, and a profound small-c political conservatism that prevents them from making the kind of regulatory changes that would allow them to build the new housing and infrastructure they need. Excess population that can’t be absorbed by the coasts tends to bounce to the growth-friendly cities of the Sunbelt that need to build anew what Milwaukee, Detroit, and Cleveland already have in terms of infrastructure and amenities.
A sensible approach would be for the federal government to take the lead in rebalancing America’s allocation of population and resources by taking a good hard look at whether so much federal activity needs to be concentrated in Washington, DC, and its suburbs. Moving agencies out of the DC area to the Midwest would obviously cause some short-term disruptions. But in the long run, relocated agencies’ employees would enjoy cheaper houses, shorter commutes, and a higher standard of living, while Midwestern communities would see their population and tax base stabilized and gain new opportunities for complementary industries to grow.
A lot of the government doesn’t need to be in DC There is a compelling basic logic to the idea of a capital city that concentrates government functions in one place so agency leaders can consult with Congress and staff can coordinate across agencies. The Treasury Department is located next to the White House, and there’s literally a secure tunnel between the buildings so the president and his team can take advantage of Treasury’s considerable institutional knowledge and expertise when crafting economic policy. Foreign diplomats are sent here to Washington, so America’s domestically based workforce of foreign service officers also needs to be based here.
But a lot of important things the government does are not political in this way.
The National Institutes of Health, for example, employs a staff of some 20,000 people — a disproportionately well-educated group of technical experts — out in the suburbs in Bethesda, Maryland. They play a crucial scientific and public interest role, but they’re not involved in day-to-day politics. The NIH’s work could easily be done from Cleveland, where 20,000 highly educated, taxpaying workers would be welcomed. Their presence would create secondary jobs in industries like restaurants, education, and home remodeling. And an infusion of skilled workers alongside the metro area’s existing health and educational resources would help build up the larger regional biomedical research sector.
In general, looking at which agencies are already not going through the trouble of locating themselves in downtown Washington is a decent signpost of which agencies’ core mission is not profoundly helped by proximity to the centers of political power.
Nearly 3,000 people work at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The Social Security Administration’s central office is in Woodlawn, Maryland, outside of Baltimore. The 4,000 employees of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services are also in Woodlawn. The US Patent and Trademark Office already has a satellite office in Detroit but maintains its main headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia. The US Geological Survey has several thousand people working in Reston, Virginia. The National Weather Service has 5,000 employees and a headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland. These and other agencies moved out of DC years ago in search of more affordable real estate — a recognition that their mission does not require routine physical proximity to elected officials. Keeping this kind of agency near DC was, obviously, more convenient for existing staff who were spared the need to drastically relocate or find a new job elsewhere. But given the growing strains of regional inequality in the United States, it would make sense for Congress to insist on taking a broader view of the national interest. Many of these agencies have technical or scientific missions whose highly skilled workforce would be a tremendous asset to cities with proud legacies that are currently suffering from brain drain and population loss.
Some DC power centers are supposed to be independent Another bloc of agencies that we should consider relocating are the ones where close coordination with elected officials is explicitly contrary to their mandate.
The alphabet soup of independent, commission-style regulatory agencies — SEC, CFTC, FTC, FEC, FCC, FAA — fits the bill here. But so do major DC players like the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the FBI (which is moving out to the suburbs anyway). These agencies’ heads do interact with Congress more frequently than the technical agencies, so decentralization might be more trouble than it’s worth. But at the same time, these are arms of the executive branch that are by law supposed to be operating independently of the White House. Symbolically manifesting that independence by having the work done out of Detroit rather than DC could have some value.
Each of these regulatory agencies is surrounded by a swarm of highly paid lawyers, economists, and lobbyists who make careers out of influencing their decisions. Right now, those folks all live in the DC metro area, where they drive up the cost of already expensive housing. Their spending would do a lot more good in Detroit, Milwaukee, or Cincinnati, where they would create secondary jobs and bolster a larger regional economy.
Greater Washington will get over it Of course, pulling tens of thousands of federal jobs out of the DC area will, in the short term, impose some pain on the local economy here. But a crucial element of the case for decentralization is that this is not a purely zero-sum transfer. The DC region of 2016 has grown big enough, rich enough, skilled enough, and expensive enough that the marginal dollar of federal spending does little real good.
Five years ago, Congress passed the sequestration deal, which imposed large spending cuts and then exempting major entitlement programs from those cuts, leading to severe cuts to the kind of federal programs whose dollars tend to stay local. At the time, DC officials worried that this would hammer the regional economy.
But we bounced back quickly. The DC region’s current big economic difficulties don’t stem from a lack of high-end jobs for highly skilled workers. We struggle instead with affordable housing, a creaking Metro system, overburdened roadways, and a consequent lack of upward mobility for the region’s less skilled workers.
If even a fairly large number of well-paid federal jobs vanished, it would just slightly stall the overall upward march of regional housing costs. If politicians from Maryland and Virginia could convince congress to throw in some money for much-needed upgrades to our mass transit system as compensation for lost jobs, it would be a win-win.
In the long term, we should think bigger Obviously, the federal government has a unique ability to alter the concentration of economic activity in the DC area. But the general problem of good-paying jobs being overly concentrated in expensive coastal metropolitan areas that don’t particularly want to build oodles of new housing — even while existing residential infrastructure goes to waste in Midwestern areas suffering population loss — isn’t limited to DC.
My work over the years has largely focused on the idea of trying to persuade Silicon Valley, Greater Boston, and New York City and its suburbs to agree to build more. That remains a good idea under any scenario. But it’s also absurd for a great nation to leave its long-term economic trajectory so fully hostage to the whims of the Palo Alto planning commission and a motley assortment of New York community boards and snob zoning groups on Long Island.
Congress is not going to pass a law telling Google it needs to move to Toledo.
But if Donald Trump is going to invest time and energy in jawboning a single medium-size company to keep a single small production facility open in Indianapolis, he should take a little time to think bigger. I’m not sure what it would take to convince a technology giant or three to decamp from Silicon Valley — where the local political system doesn’t seem to want them — to more welcoming pastures near the Great Lakes. But it would at least be worth trying to find out.
Was this article helpful? Next Up In NEW MONEY Facebook should crush fake news the way Google crushed spammy content farms Automation is inevitable. Here's how to make sure we create jobs, not just destroy them. A key Trump donor could make a ton of money from Trump's housing policy Amazon is opening a physical store without checkout lanes or cashiers Italy’s prime minister is resigning. That could have big implications for Italy’s financial system. Facebook exec: "We resisted having standards" on fake news. "That was wrong."
Most Read
Let’s relocate a bunch of government agencies to the Midwest
Doctors may have high rates of depression and suicidal thoughts because of medical school
A husband and wife each published an article. It became a case study in online harassment.
All of Donald Trump’s known conflicts of interest in one place Miami’s communities were struggling in different ways, until a citywide initiative sought to help every resident Presented ByRobert Wood Johnson Foundation Miami’s communities were struggling in different ways, until a citywide initiative sought to help every resident Get Vox in your inbox
By signing up you agree to our terms of use.
Never happen. But if so, the climate should be forbidding. Fargo. Duluth. Marquette.
That’s right, every State has a capitol building where Congress could locate to each year.
DC takes all of the tax money , skims off the top for themselves, and then spends the rest on nonsense.
20,000 people would never move to Cleveland. With all due respect to Cleveland, the ruling class wants to live in D.C, New York, Los Angeles, or San Francisco. Not Cleveland. If you picked up a whole agency, and moved it to Cleveland, 50% at least will resign to find another job in the D.C.-New York area. So there's a big win in just forcing wholesale resignations. Second, anyone who needs to be backfilled, can be backfilled from the Cleveland job market, making the agency more conservative, not the agency making the city more leftist.
How to move it? Doesn’t matter. Just renovate abandoned office buildings anywhere and use them. Universities have lecture halls for speeches. Offer those that move to Detroit 2-3 plots of abandoned houses provided they improve them within 2 years.
The D.C. population can be incorporated into Maryland-put a stop to the statehood talk. How about moving them(the Departments) to the DEEP BLUE states. It will turn Virginia red again. Ohio, Mich.,Wisc., can be ‘rewarded’ for their victories. Each has a failed city(Det.-Milwakee,Cleveland).
Require every elected official to live in their district /state.
The South Pole has plenty of room.
It amazes me that rest of the states have let it stand for so long. But then again the last time we had even 65% eligible voter turnout for presidential elections was 1908. It’s just not that important to many folks.
Freegards
Don’t send them here!
Capital: the most important city or town of a country or region, usually its seat of government and administrative center.
Build a new one.
Very good idea, I’m all for it.
The Virginia-Maryland area may have been central to the original colonies, but not so now. I’d be for somewhere in the midwest, centrally located to the contiguous states we have now, Kansas perhaps.
Cleveland Rocks :-)
Seriously, I think you overestimate the marketability of these drones. Sure, those near the top with degrees might find work in New York or Boston, but the cubicle crowd of liberal drones would move to Cleveland. Then they would find out how much further their salary went and take over the nicer neighborhoods as liberal bubble enclaves.
For the cost of the recent restoration of the US Capitol, you could build a new one.
Move it to Gitmo.
The rent is cheap. Only $4K a year, payable to Raúl.
you turn it into a hotel
You'd need a competent contractor to do that.
Probably the guy who converted the Old Post Office at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue (and is moving into 1600 next month).
I’ve advocated for the past 30 years that the seat of government be relocated to the precise geographical center of the Continental United States.
Rebuild Washington in Lincoln Nebraska... double the size of the house and senate, make the states responsible for the salaries of the elected officials and their staff.
Have more people represented by shrinking the size of the districts.
Drain the swamp by moving the snakes, and keep historic D.C. As a smith Smithsonian museum...
I am for it
Hmmm....
Reminds me of the blessing from “The Fiddler on the Roof”...
“God bless and keep the Tsar...far away from us!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.