Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germany's Wildly Complex Fusion Reactor Is Actually Working
popularmechanics.com ^ | Dec 6, 2016 | Avery Thompson

Posted on 12/09/2016 12:12:49 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper

Last year, Germany completed and turned on the Wendelstein 7-X nuclear fusion reactor. This amazing piece of technology uses a complicated design called a stellerator, and scientists have finally managed to verify that the design works like it's supposed to.

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: energy; fusion; germany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2016 12:12:49 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Fusion Energy Explained
2 posted on 12/09/2016 12:14:16 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

As opposed to all those not so complex simple fusion reactors.


3 posted on 12/09/2016 12:17:01 AM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Sort of interesting I guess it works but it is far to complicated to be commercial viable. The Thorium (MSR)reactors are simple and they work. There was one running for 4 years at Oak Ridge in the late 60’s. It was so simple and reliable you could turn it off in the evening or on a Friday and start it up again when you came back to work.


4 posted on 12/09/2016 12:19:44 AM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

I forgot to add: “...Unfortunately, current fusion reactors, including the W7-X, are still not efficient enough to produce more energy than they use. However, the success of W7-X gives the researchers hope that the next generation of fusion reactors will be able to reach that limit.”


5 posted on 12/09/2016 12:22:58 AM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

Tying your shoelace is complex until you’ve done it the third time.


6 posted on 12/09/2016 12:25:38 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

So it’s kind of like a Mercedes-Benz because it works as long as an engineer is close at hand?


7 posted on 12/09/2016 12:49:09 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1

> As opposed to all those not so complex simple fusion reactors.

I built one in my garage from plans in the back of Popular Mechanics.


8 posted on 12/09/2016 12:53:48 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Israel, Germany, launch €30 million plan to advance nanotechnology
9 posted on 12/09/2016 1:04:33 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
By tinkering with the process that plants use to breathe in carbon dioxide, a team of German scientists has just discovered a far more efficient way to get rid of it.

A New Way to Convert Carbon Dioxide

10 posted on 12/09/2016 1:08:59 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
Maiden flight for Germany's Sea Lion helo

German Navy NH90 Sea Lion performs maiden flight

11 posted on 12/09/2016 1:16:51 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper; WellyP

My 10 mile high view is that a magnetic containment field has to encircle the atoms fusing...so the magnetic field is covering a larger area than the atoms...and every part of the magnetic field needs to be stronger than the energy released by atoms fusing.

Which is not how I’d expect to get a lot of energy *out* of any stellarator/mag-field fusion reactor.

Could you get fusion from 1? Sure...but what’s that buy you?!

Pretty good chance that entire design philosophy will always require more energy for the magnetic fields than it gets from the atoms inside that field fusing.

...but, I admit that I could be wrong.


12 posted on 12/09/2016 1:22:33 AM PST by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
flying cars
13 posted on 12/09/2016 1:26:01 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WellyP

Agree. But Thorium is not good for producing fissionable bomb material, if I remember right.


14 posted on 12/09/2016 1:33:41 AM PST by honurider (no one is more indoctrinated then the indoctrinator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

“I built one in my garage from plans in the back of Popular Mechanics.”

I could done the exact some thing had that coffee ring stain from my dad not gotten right on second to last equation.


15 posted on 12/09/2016 1:39:42 AM PST by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
flying cars reminds me
16 posted on 12/09/2016 1:41:24 AM PST by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

The problem with the Wendelstein 7-X reactor, is just when you start to get it to work well, it forces you to upgrade to Wendelstein 10-X.

Wendelstein 10-X is OK, except it’s clumsy and shuts down to upgrade just about every night...


17 posted on 12/09/2016 2:07:29 AM PST by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timpanagos1
As opposed to all those not so complex simple fusion reactors.

If you compare a Polywell reactor to the Tokamak reactor, you would come away with the opinion that the Polywell is a relatively simple fusion reactor.

18 posted on 12/09/2016 2:39:49 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

I saw what you did there... :)


19 posted on 12/09/2016 3:05:45 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (I held my nose, voted for Trump, then took a shower. All to defeat evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Economical Fusion energy has been on of those things (like a manned spaceflight to Mars) that has been “only 20 years away” for the last 50 years. I would love to see it, but I’m not going to get excited until their building a working Fusion Plant down the road from my house....


20 posted on 12/09/2016 3:11:45 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson