Posted on 12/06/2016 10:20:53 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Voter fraud in Detroit naaaaaah.....In this case "no recount" may equal "protecting Democrat fraud."
In a way, Michigan is a bit like California. Urban centers vote heavily for Democrats, but the rest of the state has a tendency to break for Republicans. This means a large swath of the population is, at least politically, held hostage by a few failing, very left-wing, cities. This year, the Mitten went red for the first time since 1988, but desperate Dems were hoping Jill Stein’s ridiculous recount could “find” enough votes to tip the scales in their favor.
Now we have word that much of the State’s bluest area - Wayne County, home of the City of Detroit - will probably not even be included in the recount. Blame those pesky ballots…
The mother lode of rat voter fraud in Detroit?
Oh no. Say it isn’t so. Who would have thought.
Ronald Reagan once said (paraphrasing) that proof of life after death was visible at the end of the government bureaucracy’s business day. It can also be said that it’s apparent in every democrat voting district.
Democrats are dead soul liars and cheats. That county is run by democraps. The rulers in that county don’t want to chance their fraud/treason being exposed. But I’m sure the media will spew some blatant lie to divert attention from the TRUTH.
Michiganders may make a Jill Stein Appreciation Day to thank her for making this the last election Michigan goes Blue other than in college football. They basically admitted the process theyve been using for years to steal elections. From now on one blue paper ballot with x marks and blue finger dye, ala Baghdad with NO countycounts from “old” tabulating machines.
Hahaha. What pathetic losers. LIBs are lunatics.
match the address of the voter with GoogleEarth....
Easy to do. Just run "favorable" ballots thru the machine 4 or 5 times.
It is going to be hilarious if the result of Stein's attempt to thwart Trump's win in the battleground States inadvertently exposes massive voter fraud. The very voter fraud Trump talked about which the MSM dismissed out of hand. Now the recount is focussing a spotlight where Dems probably never thought anyone would look.
Only 4 states can stop vote fraud
WND.com ^ | 12/1/2016 | Leo Hohmann
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3501377/posts
Do Illegal Votes Decide Elections?
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Dec 1, 2016 | Hans von Spakovsky and John Fund
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3501010/posts
HUUUGE NEVADA VOTER FRAUD UNCOVERED? WORSE THAN ACORN
Newsmax ^ | Dec 1, 2016
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3500628/posts
87 broken or jamed scanners do not account for discrepancies in 392 precincts. Does anyone know the number of votes involved in these discrepancies?
Yes. I don’t know that these discrepancies should be allowed to stand. Rather than saying, “the original count stands”, someone should go to a court and say, “These discrepancies are proof that these counties should be the focus of recounts because this is evidence of voting irregularities.”
Translation:
Wayne County does not want to open this can of rat fraud worms.
People could go to jail.
I took the online training for the recount. If the seal on the ballot box/bag does not match up on the quantity of what is inside vs the record, then that whole precinct is not recountable and they go with the original totals. I suspect they will see a lot of that in Detroit.
MI was already recounted because the narrow margin triggered it. Trump won both times.
And lotsa extra ballots stuffed in the boxes.
I took the online training for the recount. If the seal on the ballot box/bag does not match up on the quantity of what is inside vs the record, then that whole precinct is not recountable and they go with the original totals. I suspect they will see a lot of that in Detroit.
"Poll workers are supposed to adjust counters to reflect a single vote but in many cases failed to do so, causing the discrepancies, Baxter said.
In other words, in a heavily Democrat area, ballots “may” have been counted multiple times, election workers “may” have failed to correct for the overage, and now there’s a “ballot problem” that “may” prevent a recount."
Is there a single Republican ballot "accidentally" fed through the machine? Probably not. Amazing how Democrat ballots are "accidentally" fed through repeatedly for wrongful counts. Yes, really amazed.
Do thee job right the first time.
It’s not eligible, because people could have stuffed ballots after the election, or taken ballots out. Obviously Wayne County has problems that should be investigated, but it’s hard to do a “recount” when the original numbers are official.
It could, many ballot locations have more than one precinct voting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.