Posted on 11/28/2016 7:16:21 AM PST by FreedomUS
WaPo the always warrior with a poisonous passion in its OBSESSIVE anti Trump-ism, is 100% sure Trump's charge of illegal votes is 'false.'
"Donald Trump’s bogus claim that millions of people voted illegally for Hillary Clinton" - Washington Post Nov-27-2016.
It's one thing to call it: unproven, another thing to be so certain it's not true with no evidence to base it upon.
However, what is so certain is that in 2013:
"Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote - U.S." NBC - Jun 17, 2013 - The Supreme Court on Monday struck down an Arizona law that requires ... requirement for would-be voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship. .... http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06
---
I remember how CNN demonized Guiliani for questioning Hillary's health. Also CNN anchor was so sure that the rumours are completely false, she called it ' "conspiracy theories"... The likes of "birtherim" ' And asked if we should call it "health-ism". And so was the headline in TheAtlantic: "Questions About Hillary's Health: The Birtherism of 2016 - The Atlantic - Aug 22, 2016 [ http://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/496847/ ]
Then of course came the 9/11 Clip of Hillary falling....
Clinton got California’s 55 electoral votes, which is all she would get if the entirety of Latin America voted for her.
Motor Voter for illegals obtaining driver’s licenses.
Same day “registration”.
Yeah, no illegals voted.
Looks like Katherine Graham’s successors got their noses caught in the wringer.
Gee thanks Uncle Media Guy we trust you so that ends this. Thanks so much you’re a great guy Uncle Media.
IIRC, illegals are counted in the US census just like legal citizens.
If they weren’t CA wouldn’t have nearly that number of electors.
Without voterID’s, how can they be certain?
The Historic Facts About Illegal Alien Voters (Full Research pdf - 2.8M+ illegals voted)
Wonder why they said that they couldn't do it?
So sayeth the liberal Svengalis.
“It’s one thing to call it: unproven, another thing to be so certain it’s not true with no evidence to base it upon.”
Why does that standard not apply to Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton?
Thanks for this info.
I love it when the media insults my intelligence on an almost-daily basis, and then wonders why they get booed out of Trump rallies.
They have evolved into being the partisan agents of a corrupt establishment.
If Voter ID is such a burden to “minorities” and the “elderly”, where are all the disenfranchisement complaints from the States with Voter ID?
Have any lawyer types actually checked into the logistics of the vote?
From what I can see, many states, including CA, allow you to vote if you are simply a resident.
The theory is if you are at least a resident, you can vote on local issues, but not federal ones, like the prez.
Whether you agree w/that or not is besides the point I’m making.
As far as I can tell, an illegal who is a resident that goes to vote does NOT get a ballot different from anyone else. There will still be a check box for prez.
There is also NO personally identifiable info on the ballot.
So if an illegal who is resident votes, they are able to vote for prez because they get the same ballot as everyone else, and it gets counted because there’s no way to tell from the ballot that the person was only allowed to vote on local stuff.
Have any lawyer types actually checked into the logistics of the vote?
From what I can see, many states, including CA, allow you to vote if you are simply a resident.
The theory is if you are at least a resident, you can vote on local issues, but not federal ones, like the prez.
Whether you agree w/that or not is besides the point I’m making.
As far as I can tell, an illegal who is a resident that goes to vote does NOT get a ballot different from anyone else. There will still be a check box for prez.
There is also NO personally identifiable info on the ballot.
So if an illegal who is resident votes, they are able to vote for prez because they get the same ballot as everyone else, and it gets counted because there’s no way to tell from the ballot that the person was only allowed to vote on local stuff.
Trump has rickrolled them again.
By February his DOJ will be out there producing PROOF that illegals voted.
Dems are gonna rue the day they called for this recount.
The Democrats designed the Motor Voter Law to increase the democrat roles. When someone registers to vote, they are claiming to be a citizen. However, it is purely an honor system. It is not the DMV’s responsibility to verify that they are a citizen, and the voter registration departments don't verify that either. The most that they generally do is verify that the address is indeed a real address. There are substantial penalties for violating the law, but if there is no verification of citizenship actually performed, then non-citizens can vote without fear of the penalties. To maintain that no illegals vote is silly. The Washington Post might as we maintain that illegal aliens commit no crimes at all in the US.
On October 28, 2015, Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill into law that automatically registers all holders of a drivers license as a registered voter for all California ballots, including federal elections.
INCLUDING FEDERAL ELECTIONS
The growing illegal population in California (and nationally) contributed largely to Hillary Clinton’s false claim of winning the popular vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.