Posted on 11/25/2016 7:09:22 PM PST by rhett october
“Haven’t you been told before by the mods to stop disrupting threads?”
That’s a new one.
“How dare you reply to my nonsense! That’s disrupting threads!”
Thread of what? A string of loons passing absurd conspiracy theories and nonsensical statements?
Said the same thing to all of the clowns going all the way back to the infamous “Trump was a Hillary plant” loonbat theory, all the way to the “the FBI reopened the Hillary case so that she would get a bump in the polls” line of nonsense.
Believe me, I haven’t been tired of being right so many times in the face of more nuttiness.
Gosh, it looks like all of his blog threads are being moved to the blog section...
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rhettoctober/index?tab=articles
Whatever
WI allows any candidate who pays to ask for recount no reason needed.
Remember that Trump has said for a year or more that in war you act not broadcast what you plan to do. None of us know what is being done on Trump’s side. He did not win to now lose. I would not want to be on Trump’s bad side and I don’t want to see the ban on the GOP contesting extends 4 years so I trust it is all being handled wisely.
Hope your right and the GOP is working hard behind the scenes to contest or formally object to the recount of WI (which the Trump campaign has the right to do).
Who knows what has gone on with the ballots since the election. I for one will never underestimate the levels to which the Rats will go to steal WI.
PA thankfully will likely not get recounted since critical deadlines for requesting recounts or audits at the county level have passed and her only option is to go before a PA State Appellate Court judge and contest the certification and request a statewide audit/recount be ordered by the court. But you must also submit to the judge REAL evidence of either fraud or large disparities in the vote count between the final count and the recount.
Stein has no real evidence just theories, so PA will for sure remain in Trumps camp unless she gets the most crooked judge they have.
Don’t know about MI procedures.
Not sure I agree about the tyranny. Having a link from each ballot back to who it was issued to seems like the only way to be sure no more than one ballot was cast by each person. Otherwise somebody could show up and demand a provisional ballot claiming they lost theirs or never received it and there would be no way to verify their original wasn’t already cast. Who/what they voted for doesn’t need to be linked to anything (except the totals), but we need to know the ballot was used to prevent duplicates. If there is no record of who voted for what, I don’t see the opportunity for tyranny.
I envisioned that the ballot would be mailed out attached to the voter guide, which obviously has the name and address on it. Then people would fill out the ballot at home, bring the whole thing to the polling place, show their ID matches the name and address on the voter guide, detach the ballot and insert it into the machine reader or ballot box.
The ballot would need to have a barcoded unique serial# in order to use the correct key to interpret it as well as be sure it is the correct unique ballot for that voter. No two ballots should have the questions or possible choices in the same order — that would prevent anyone using a template to rapidly fill out a bunch of unclaimed ballots.
Michigan is one of those states. Jill Stein is conning them into sending money to pay for a recount that was already done.
It will be a great day when Hillary and Soros join their friend Castro!
+1
Stein has admitted there is no evidence of fraud. So, are they trying to monkey with the EVs or is this a scam.
The tyranny comes in being able to link a ballot to a voter and knowing how that voter cast his vote. Voters who do not vote the "correct" way would find themselves targeted in any number of ways: their building permit is "irregular", their car suddenly violates emissions standards, their employer suddenly found their performance sub-par, etc. It is for this reason that unions prefer "open" ballots rather than anonymous ones.
You can tell if someone votes more than once through voter ID. When you show up at the precinct to vote, your name is on a list of registered voters. With voter ID, you verify that you sign next to your name and no other. Without voter ID, you could show up in multiple precincts and choose any name next to an unsigned slot. So, what I am thinking is that you show up, show your ID and sign your name, then you get a serial numbered ballot which is marked on another ledger as "distributed." You vote, you hand the ballot back. At that time, it is marked as "used." If you mess up and need another ballot, the spoiled ballot is marked "invalid" and another is issued. For provisional ballots, there would have to be a mechanism to link the ballot to the voter, but only until the ballot is found legitimate. At that time, it would be de-identified and placed with the other ballots.
After the election, the process could be audited to ensure that the number of ballots cast matches the number of voters who showed up.
Putting the questions/candidate names in random order would be another safeguard. That would help to combat the type of fraud where eighty different names are registered at the address of the same empty lot.
There are all kinds of things that can be done to safeguard our elections. The fact is, the left does not want to safeguard, because any validation of the election process makes it harder for them to manufacture votes.
The Clinton campaign has formally joined in the recount efforts in WI adding a new twist. I smell a Rat here. Likely enough bogus Hillary ballots have been added to the stacks of counted ballots statewide in WI and are waiting to be recounted. The hacking claim will give them some cover. I doubt the ballots have been stored in a secure location.
I sincerely the Trump campaign gets off their duffs publicly and exercises their rights to file a formal objection to the WI board of Elections and shut this recount down, especially if there are ballot security issues!!
I didn't realize that myself. Why penalize half of the voters just because checking every ballot by hand takes so long?
The WI board of elections is set to authorize at least a machine recount of the whole state and possibly a hand recount UNLESS the Trump campaign gets off its duffs and gets WI GOP Election Lawyers to file a formal objection to the board and try to get the recount thrown out!
Now there’s reports that Clinton is going to join the recount. Ivan always has a plan. Anybody who poo-poos this is full of poo. Remain always vigilant my FRiends.
That is why Team Trump needs to get their lawyers into WI and fight to get the recount stopped or at least limit it to a statewide machine recount only which should only take a couple of days.
If the numbers from the final vote count and the recount remain nearly the same, would then that should end the recount period and not allow it to drag on with prescinct audits or hand recounts. I hope I’m wrong but I wouldn’t be surprised to hear that ballot security/integrity is lax at best, making it possible to slip in massive amounts of bogus ballots and we see massive amounts of new Hillary votes in the recount which will be blamed on a “hack”!
Amen. An idiot Freeper who shall not be named calls me a conspiracy look. This isn’t a conspiracy it is real now that Clinton is involved in just WI for now.
Our side especially the WI GOP ( along with the MI and PA GOP) and Team Trump better wake the heck up and start fighting this crap. Something is definitely afoot here and hearing nothing but crickets from our side is disheartening!!
CONTEST STATES HILLARY NARROWLY WON! Now that would throw a monkey wrench into this plan.
Ahhh, stuff it and let the other people here decide with our clicks. This is clearly better than the tripe from mainstream “accepted” sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.