Yes, a noticeable oversight.
EVERYONE knows the election is rigged by the DEMS. this is well known. between busing and ballot stuffing, it’ll be difficult for them not to win by too much
there is no need to ask hillary... as they both fully expect her to win
But her answers don't mean any more than "the pledge" meant to Kasich or Bush. She lies about everything.
As for the press, its job is to make you forget the past, and give up thinking for yourself.
Wallace let Hillary make her prepared speeches...on and on and on!
Seems as though Wallace was implying that Trump was not in favor of a peaceful transition of power.
Somehow I see the Clinton types rioting before I can see Trump supporters going off.
For me it is very telling that there will be voter fraud. I hope and pray Donald will fight back and never concede.
After Donald answered that question it looks like Hillary became angry by her facial expression.
It was a stupid question because if there is obvious voter fraud, why the hell would you accept “the winner”? If Hillary is getting 100% of the votes in certain districts (like she was getting in New York during her Senate election) that were polling even before, what nut is going to accept that? Well maybe an idiot like Rick Lazio would, but Trump? I don’t think so.
I noticed that too. he let her blabber on and on about Trump’s answer, but he never made her answer the question & never gave the the presumption that she would lose. He only put in everyone’s mind that Trump would be the loser.
Jack Freaking Kennedy and his army of the voting, if not walking, dead.
FR is sluggish this week. :(
I haven’t watched Fox for almost a year. In fact my TV has been off for almost that long. Wallace reminds me of an old vaudeville actor that needs to be yanked off the stage. Pitiful.
Everyone. . .don’t forget to Freepathon!!!!
He also fails to ask if We The People will accept a Helliary victory; I for one will not.
Because Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to God.
That evil b**** belongs in prison or the morgue.
That’s because he doesn’t want to use it later as a headline to smear Hillary with.
If Trump wins, Hillary will be too busy haulun’ ass out of the country, unless Obama issues her a blanket pardon.
Then, he’ll have to pardon himself before January 20, 2017, or, move back to Kenya.
I think it’s not a significant issue.
This would have been a good time for Trump to say he would accept the results if not strong evidence of voter fraud. Trump missed the opportunity to ask Wallace if he watched the O’Keefe videos. He should have then asked Hillary the same.
I really don’t think anyone but a few weasels in the media cared what he said.
Did Algore accept the results of the 2000 election? No the Supreme Court had to uphold FL law.
Nixon accepted the vote-fraud-ridden 1960 results.
Are we supposed to forget Gore 2000 and his plane loads of shyster lawyers going down to Florida to challenge the results in a stacked Democrat Florida Supreme Court and the fact that the SCOTUS had to knock down that court's order to steal Bush's election?
Can’t wait to see the numbers from it, like how many times Trump was interrupted, how many times Clinton was allowed to speak without being forced to stop.
When you have the recent tapes provided by Project Veritas showing how the Dems commit voter fraud and use violence to disrupt Trump rallies, why would Trump have to accept the legitimacy of the election results?