It was a stupid question because if there is obvious voter fraud, why the hell would you accept “the winner”? If Hillary is getting 100% of the votes in certain districts (like she was getting in New York during her Senate election) that were polling even before, what nut is going to accept that? Well maybe an idiot like Rick Lazio would, but Trump? I don’t think so.
The point of O’Keefe’s sources was that “you could f*ck your mother in front of the governor’s mansion and nobody would do anything about it.” - referring to being able to get away with voter fraud.
It’s an open secret that they steal elections like they’ve been doing for the past 50 years and ain’t gonna quit now.... yet the only person who is “offensive” to the media machine is the one who says he won’t promnise to smile and act like everything is fine when we all watch it happen and say it’s just inevitable and America can’t ever be anything but a banana republic.
I DESPISE these media hacks. They have no clue what it even means to be a patriot. It’s not in their vocabulary.
Pathetic.
the question was premature