To: poconopundit
Agreed. I had the same reaction to this guy's whitewash. It seems to me he tried to hedge his own bet so that if Hillary wins, he can still salvage his "model" and his reputation by claiming the election was so borderline the model was just slightly off. These liberals are so transparent.
To: hinckley buzzard; Red Steel
He's hedging his bets for sure.
And my guess the condition of getting covered by WaPo in the first place was that he would trash Trump in the video.
12 posted on
09/24/2016 12:28:54 PM PDT by
poconopundit
(When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
To: hinckley buzzard; poconopundit
Good job, Poconopundit.
I agree with you.
I noted that at a minimum there was a huge contest for the democrat nomination. Had it not been rigged and all the super-delegate numbers always put on Clinton’s numbers from the very first primary, she would not have seemed to be running away with the race. It would have been neck and neck, and that would have strengthened Sanders and weakened Clinton.
Sanders truly was cheated, and then the WikiLeaks emails came out to prove it.
13 posted on
09/24/2016 12:29:27 PM PDT by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson