Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Vanity) FOX News: There's really nothing wrong with what Candy Crowley did!
vanity | 8/11/2016 | Self

Posted on 08/11/2016 2:58:59 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano

FOX News - the Five - consensus echoes what was being said by others on the Network yesterday.

There's nothing really wrong with what Candy Crowley did during the debate - and it didn't really affect anything.

Dana Perino said she's known Candy Crowley for years - and Perino attests that it wasn't intentional.

Gutfeld added that he thought it wasn't a real or sincere issue for Trump to have concerns about the Fairness of Debate Moderators.

Seems FOX is focused on defeating points of the right. Numerous panel members dismissed Candy Crowley's actions as much ado about nothing.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016debates; debatesfox; liberalmedia; msm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: AnthonySoprano
Proudly Fox free since Snarkapalooza I --Aug6, 2015
41 posted on 08/11/2016 3:31:35 PM PDT by Company Man (T R U M P - P E N C E 2 0 1 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano; All

Switch your channel to Fox Business. It’s significantly better. I never turn on FNC.


42 posted on 08/11/2016 3:32:08 PM PDT by Chgogal (A woman who votes for Hillary is voting with her vagina and not her brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

INce every member of the Commission on Presidnetial Debates is a democRAT or major RINO, what could possible go wrong for Trump?


43 posted on 08/11/2016 3:32:41 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
If this came up as an issue and they argued about it somebody must have taken the other side. Or were they all on Crowley's side?

Crowley definitely did take Obama's side in the debate. Afterwards, though, she tried to walk it back a bit, saying that Romney wasn't entirely wrong. Perino picked up on that and read more into Crowley's comment than it may have deserved. Dana Perino got her job with Bush because she could work with the mainstream media, so she tends to give CNN the benefit of the doubt.

44 posted on 08/11/2016 3:32:49 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Perrin is a jerk...once she left the pentagon and got her name out there she has become very full of herself. She is as lefty as they come. She gets all twitchy if anyone suggests anything bad about the GOPe


45 posted on 08/11/2016 3:35:49 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

-

Yes!

Look at the stories they censor.

They led the hard news Political program with a story of a football player that had an imaginary girlfriend.

Obama made up a girlfriend in his book and portrayed fictional stories of racism as real, but that’s not newsworthy.

As long as everyone understands that FOX is trying to further the double standard.

-


46 posted on 08/11/2016 3:35:54 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Stumbled across Beck’s program today....It was hysterical he was railing against TPP .....I guess someone forgot to tell him Ted loves TPP


47 posted on 08/11/2016 3:37:39 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
 photo b2c82d8b-7606-4cd3-8213-1555118884db_zpsryj0kb4x.jpg
48 posted on 08/11/2016 3:38:53 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
Why is anyone watching these people any more?

Why?

49 posted on 08/11/2016 3:42:46 PM PDT by riri (Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Gutfeld has been dead to me for the past 13 months.

FU you obnoxious runt..


50 posted on 08/11/2016 3:47:02 PM PDT by mowowie (Press 2 for Deportation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riri

Watch Fox Business and OANN


51 posted on 08/11/2016 3:50:23 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

at some point, you have to stop complaining and move on. We’re all in unknown territory. He has to do his share.


52 posted on 08/11/2016 3:51:28 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Faux is still “dead to me”.


53 posted on 08/11/2016 3:54:10 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

These same people for 8 years have been leading the campaign that there's never a good time to oppose Barack Obama.


Rule #1: You can't be seen opposing Barack Obama. How'd that work out?

54 posted on 08/11/2016 3:54:10 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

But how did Crowley have the information on hand; it’s like Obama knew what was going to be asked. Geeze, like Candy wouldn’t have prepared Obama before hand, just like Hillary will have all the questions before hand.


55 posted on 08/11/2016 3:54:40 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Agreed!


56 posted on 08/11/2016 3:54:52 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

I have a suggestion for the debates - How about the two adversaries ask each other the questions. A judge is there only to call time limits etc. That way no “journalist” controls the questions or the answers. It would be a battle for sure.


57 posted on 08/11/2016 3:55:19 PM PDT by wmont2 (wmont2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano
(article):" Dana Perino said she's known Candy Crowley for years - and Perino attests that it wasn't intentional. "

When someone says ,' remember that information I gave you just before tonight's debate'
and Crowley responds saying :oh yeah !
That's called a "set-up"
And I question Crowleys integrity, and now Perino's
The other debates participant's integrity is already known !

58 posted on 08/11/2016 3:55:50 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt ( British historian Arnold Toynbee - Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano

Only a former Bush spokeswomen would spew this type of sewage to the public.

Perino = 100% Globalist/Establishment Hack spokeswoman fraud

Listening to such rubbish reminds me out of how much I cannot stand the Bush wing.

They are nothing more than DNC Operatives with “R”s by their names. All they do is surrender on everything. They are worthless in other words.


59 posted on 08/11/2016 3:56:28 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnthonySoprano; All

Hey you forgot BARF ALERT.


60 posted on 08/11/2016 3:57:26 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson