Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 4 Most Damaging Emails From the DNC WikiLeaks Dump
ABC News ^ | July 25, 2016 | Alana Abramson and Shushannah Walshe

Posted on 07/26/2016 1:13:20 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

WikiLeaks leaked nearly 20,000 emails on Friday from top Democratic National Committee officials, exchanged from January 2015 through May 2016. Several emails released show that although the DNC was supposed to remain neutral during the primary contest, officials grew increasingly agitated with Bernie Sanders and his campaign, at some points even floating ideas about ways to undermine his candidacy.

The source of the leak has not been revealed, though Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook, said on ABC News' "This Week With George Stephanopoulos" on Sunday that he believes the Russians were instrumental in it.

"Experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, took all these emails and now are leaking them out through these websites," Mook said Sunday....

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: democrats; hillaryhacked; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: hecticskeptic

Excellent. You know the Democrat playbook very well — lie, fall back, lie, fall back, lie until you are backed into a corner and then blame it on cosmic radiation or global warming.


21 posted on 07/26/2016 1:44:46 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If Donald’s supporters were as thin skinned he wouldn’t have lasted a week!

I doubt there are only 4 but The four cited are:

1)
NC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz Calls Sanders Campaign Manager Jeff Weaver an “A—” and a “Liar”

..... Debbie Wasserman Schultz, once she was notified of the exchange, wrote “Damn liar. Particularly scummy that he never acknowledges the violent and threatening behavior that occurred.”

In another instance, right before the Nevada Convention, Weaver publicly commented, “I think we should go to the [national] convention.” The chairwoman was flagged about this comment and responded in an e-mail, “He is an a—.”

2)
Highlighting Sanders’ Faith

One email shows that a DNC official contemplated highlighting Sanders’ alleged atheism — even though he has said he is not an atheist — during the primaries as a possibility to undermine support among voters.

3)

Building a Narrative Against Sanders

“Wondering if there’s a good Bernie narrative for a story which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess,”

4)
Lamentations That Sanders Is Not a Democrat

Wasserman Schultz appeared to grow exasperated with Sanders’ desire to stay in the race when the delegate math was against him —

Let them fighht themselves straight into failure!


22 posted on 07/26/2016 1:55:07 PM PDT by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Experts ? If you had any of those the Russians would not have broken into your email server in the first place.


23 posted on 07/26/2016 1:58:28 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IllumiNaughtyByNature

The 4 they cite are damaging, but primarily within the dem. party itself.
I think the more important revelations involve the press and they will not cover those. The revelation that the MSM is firmly attacked, Siamese-twin fashion, to the dem. party, is the real story, because that will continue long after this election is over.

There is no free and unfettered, much less unbiased, press at this point. There are media conglomerates aligned with the left that seek to tell Americans what to see, think, and do. This is the huge scandal from my point of view.


24 posted on 07/26/2016 1:58:29 PM PDT by The Continental Op
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

My vote goes for all those emails showing collusion between the ‘rats and the MSM - stories submitted to the DNC for vetting before going to editors, Chuck Todd and Jake Tapper contacted personally with comments on their coverage, and on - pressies involved should be called out for comment before one more Republican is subjected to one of their rigged interviews.....


25 posted on 07/26/2016 2:21:12 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta

“I could be wrong, but wasn’t there a report a few months ago about a “Physical Break-in” of a DNC office?”

Unless some hack was confusing the hacking of the server with a real break-in somewhere, I think it’s a case of a hack reporter not knowing what “hacking a server” means.


26 posted on 07/26/2016 2:24:00 PM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, took all these emails and now are leaking them out through these websites," Mook said


27 posted on 07/26/2016 2:26:08 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Why would the Russians hurt hillary? Her “reset” is the best thing to happen to them since Yalta.
28 posted on 07/26/2016 2:30:17 PM PDT by fungoking (40% share for a TV show is a hit; in the 2016 election it a loss in a landslide, hello Pres Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, because Russia has always operated this way. Not.


29 posted on 07/26/2016 2:30:44 PM PDT by petitfour (Americans need to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Monica lived at the Watergate.


30 posted on 07/26/2016 2:31:49 PM PDT by petitfour (Americans need to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
 photo zoolander2_zpsg826islb.jpg
31 posted on 07/26/2016 2:35:24 PM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It isn't "hacking" if they simply logged into the server...


32 posted on 07/26/2016 2:37:43 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SparkyBass

Was the DNC server less secure or more secure than Hillary’s private server?


33 posted on 07/26/2016 2:41:10 PM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is The Russians did this, then they can blackmail Hillary at will.


34 posted on 07/26/2016 2:42:18 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Hillary's nominatin = 60's Violence. "Constant conflict is actually often good politics"-Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP
"Was the DNC server less secure or more secure than Hillary’s private server?"

My guess... either everything from the DNC server went to Hillary's server (blind copy) or someone within the DNC somehow grew a conscience and delivered.

35 posted on 07/26/2016 2:44:39 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sauropod; tet68

“Paging G. Gordon Liddy, paging G. Gordon Liddy! Mr. Liddy please pick up the courtesy phone in the lobby.”


36 posted on 07/26/2016 3:04:00 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Normally I'm just a lurker, so forgive me if I goof something up.
Unless I have missed it, why has nobody been screaming from the rooftops that the director of the FBI just schooled us during the Hillary server pardon that hackers don't usually leave any traces of being in a system? But now all of a sudden they know who has been in there...and that they changed/edited the documents? Where were these so called experts then. I think we should demand their proof.
37 posted on 07/26/2016 3:15:07 PM PDT by 3ZZZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Occam’s razor: the Russians would have kept this all secret, for use as blackmail later.

So would ________________ (write in enemy or friend country, who stands to benefit from blackmail).


38 posted on 07/26/2016 3:19:26 PM PDT by combat_boots (MSM: We lie to you sheep at the slaughterhouse to keep you calm during slaughter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3ZZZ

FWIW.

I heard that these hackers, left behind a piece of software code that would direct future emails to them.

Not aware of a claim that documents were changed or edited.


39 posted on 07/26/2016 3:20:26 PM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta
Saw Donna Brazille in a video saying we know it was from the Russian hackers and that they were changed before release. Just makes me wonder why they didn't leave any traces in Hillary server.
40 posted on 07/26/2016 3:30:16 PM PDT by 3ZZZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson