Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jcon40

I found that to be the better option. It’s better to have a known quality of homeless be allowed on your property to keep the lesser quality off.
It’s
also a point of ministry. If he’s a good guy and is just trying to get back on his feet, having an address is an absolute necessity.


49 posted on 06/18/2016 3:45:50 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30
yep....an address for the homeless is helpful. We had set up a Community Resource Center close by that not only gave them an address but access point for services ie substance abuse, mental health, computers, job center etc..

Being a plumbing contractor I had also donated 2 good quality portable showers which were used more than anything there, especially to cook drugs and have sex in

This was set up next the food kitchen. .separate building.

6 months ago all was closed... sad but understandable. Long story. ..after 5 years of running somewhat successfully on almost all private $$$

At this point I've lost faith in expecting the 99% of those in need having an interest in learning to take care of themselves much less be a part of helping others ....

Disappointing

70 posted on 06/18/2016 8:10:31 AM PDT by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson