Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Uninsured Cars Off the Road Through Reforming No-Fault
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 5/16/2016 | Michael Van Beek

Posted on 05/18/2016 1:24:55 PM PDT by MichCapCon

Owning and operating a car in Michigan is expensive and it’s going to get more expensive soon. Fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees will increase next January. Another cost to driving is being insured, which is increasingly pricey. Having raised the cost of driving by hiking taxes and fees, policymakers owe it to taxpayers to make an effort to bring down the cost of auto insurance in Michigan.

The case for reforming Michigan’s auto insurance laws is straightforward: Michigan has the highest average rate in the entire country at $2,738 per year, according to Insure.com. That’s more than twice the national average of $1,325 and 19 percent higher than the second-highest state. Since there’s nothing exceptional about Michiganders’ driving habits (despite the anecdotal evidence you may see on the highway), that high average can be attributed to Michigan’s unique auto insurance laws.

Without a doubt, the most important feature governing auto insurance here is the requirement that every driver purchase “unlimited personal injury protection,” coverage that provides lifetime medical benefits for someone injured in an accident. No other state forces everyone to buy this type of insurance. New York has the second-highest requirements for PIP insurance, and it only requires $50,000 worth of coverage.

Uncapped PIP benefits mean that there is no limit to what medical facilities can charge insurance companies for servicing individuals injured in automobile accidents. And only a tiny portion of people injured in car accidents even need this type of coverage: A 2007 analysis of approximately 70,000 PIP claims found that 94 percent of them were under $50,000 and averaged just $3,966 per claim.

Michigan also uses a no-fault insurance system, which is rare among the states — only 12 have a similar approach. Michigan’s no-fault experiment started in 1973, and it requires that, after an accident, each involved party’s insurance company pay for all the medical expenses, wage losses and property damage no matter who is at fault. In other states, drivers who cause accidents are liable for more of the costs incurred by the accident and those not at fault can sue for additional damages. No-fault insurance does reduce litigation and administrative costs, but given Michigan’s sky-high rates, it needs to be reconsidered.

Due to the nature of the auto insurance market, it is important to keep rates as low as possible, especially for low-income individuals. The more uninsured drivers there are, the higher the costs of providing insurance for everyone. But the higher the costs of providing insurance, the higher the premiums companies must charge, and the more likely it is for people not to be able to afford insurance. In other words, there’s a snowball effect that occurs when insurance rates increase. No surprise, then, that Michigan, with its absurdly high rates, has the fifth-most uninsured drivers in the country. According to the Insurance Information Institute, every fifth car you see on a road in Michigan is uninsured.

While the snowball effect can work to drive insurance premiums up, it can work in the other direction, too. If insurance rates drop, more people will buy insurance, which will put downward pressure on insurance costs since there will be fewer uninsured. In a virtuous circle, then, premiums will become more affordable for more people, and so on.

To improve the current situation, policymakers should ditch the one-size-fits-all mandates of unlimited PIP and no-fault insurance and allow consumers to choose the level of coverage they want. Some drivers may still want to pay extra for unlimited PIP and no-fault, and that’s perfectly fine. Others would trade less generous coverage for lower premiums. These lower-cost options are especially important for drivers who are currently priced out of the market. They may not end up with ultra-generous unlimited PIP and no-fault benefits, but some insurance coverage is definitely better than none at all.

The high cost of insuring vehicles in Michigan is not a new problem. Michigan’s had the highest rates nationally for three years running, and Gov. Snyder and leaders in the Legislature have made proposals to reduce these costs. Yet nothing significant has gotten done. Pricey insurance rates increase the costs of doing business in Michigan and force some people to choose between driving illegally and holding a job. The time has come for reform.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cars

1 posted on 05/18/2016 1:24:55 PM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Holy bleep!!!

The average cost in Michigan is five times what it costs me to insure my mid size passenger car in a major California urban area. Wow. Just wow.


2 posted on 05/18/2016 1:32:19 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

“Due to the nature of the auto insurance market, it is important to keep rates as low as possible, especially for low-income individuals.”

Where do they teach these gems of wisdom?


3 posted on 05/18/2016 1:34:19 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I apologize for not apologizing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

They tried to cap PIP at $1 million, then at $10 million, but it was shot down by the MCCA.


4 posted on 05/18/2016 1:35:23 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

No-fault means make everyone pay for an individual’s negligence. Socialism.


5 posted on 05/18/2016 1:36:42 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Freedom of speech: an illusion that Americans hold fast to, although it disappeared decades ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

bfl


6 posted on 05/18/2016 1:37:04 PM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

The insurance is difficult to manage with two cars. I think we’d better off quitting our lower paying jobs and ditching a vehicle. (We are retired, but work) Certain counties in Michigan have much higher insurance, like Wayne.


7 posted on 05/18/2016 1:46:04 PM PDT by madison10 (#NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Ours is about $2170 per year. One car is 3 years old and one 15 years old. An hour north of year the rates go up ALOT. What are rates in other states?


8 posted on 05/18/2016 1:54:58 PM PDT by madison10 (#NeverHillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

After years of attempts, I was able to secure classic car insurance in Michigan without the “daily driver” requirement for an additional newer vehicle. This saved at least 50%.

The insurance situation in Michigan is a travesty and an embarrassment. The only beneficiaries are plaintiff’s bar and the lawless scumbags - both BIG Democrat constituencies.


9 posted on 05/18/2016 2:04:08 PM PDT by CreviceTool (A Good Samaritan with a handgun saved my life...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And you get to pick what type of coverage you have.

This is classic result of the government deciding that they know best. Unlimited liability means that fraud is rampant and attorneys are making a killing


10 posted on 05/18/2016 2:29:25 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

That would mean deporting all illegal aliens


11 posted on 05/18/2016 2:51:38 PM PDT by notaliberal (St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

Finally.

A few years ago, I sent a legislative proposal to Alan Sanborn, who was my senator. I proposed a five year sentence for anyone caught driving without insurance and a $250,000 insurance cap.

No insurance? Walk or take the bus. I called it the “I don’t care about your personal problems auto insurance reform act.”

Sanborn agreed but told me that there was no way it would go anywhere at that point.


12 posted on 05/18/2016 3:05:34 PM PDT by cyclotic (Liberalism is what smart looks like to stupid people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson