Why doesn’t the NYT just move to Havana?
The recent polling trend is in Trumps favor. He is rising in the polls and Hillary is falling.
Seeing repeated polls that Hillary “leads” by two or three percent, especially polls where she has 38 or 41%. I view her as the incumbent and that indicates very little support.
So I’m guessing Trump leads right now.
I just don’t think they will let her be the nominee.
Whistle louder! There’s something moving among the headstones!
It’s been interesting that the polls are so tight.
Frequently in pre-election polls, this far out, the Democrat candidate is reported to be way ahead in polls.
The actual election results are always closer than these polls would indicate.
If you go back and check polls for Carter-Ford in 1976, Reagan-Carter in 1980, Bush-Dukakis in 1988, even Obama-Romney in 2012, you will see that early polls showed the Democrat cruising to an easy victory. But history tells us that the GOP won some of those elections.
But in any event, the GOP candidate ends up doing much better in actual votes than these polls would suggest.
Yes, I’m suggesting that these polls aren’t entirely accurate and could be doctored to try to spin us that the Democrat is more popular than he/she really is.
Sorry to be long winded, but to get to my point, the point is, if Hillary is in a tight race in the polls now, rather than being comfortably ahead, the way these polls run, she’s in serious trouble for the general election.
I’d love to see Bernie bludgeon her in OR. Really salivating over that possibility.
This is even more valid.
Look for the polls just after the Republican Convention in July. If they show Trump ahead of Hillary, she will not be able to catch up. Nothing she does after that will move her up in the polls.
I am beginning to think those polls early on were simply a scare tactic used by the Uniparty to scare voters away from voting for Trump.
Fixed it!
I don’t believe the liberal media polls, period. Hillary Clinton cannot “win” the presidency without MASSIVE election fraud with computer vote machine hacking, which, of course, I don’t put past the democrats.
Well, according to this past weeks The Economist, he's also a North Korean dictator.
Hillary is about the very worst candidate possible for the D’s.
And the NYT, while obviously seriously biased, does have some intelligent people in its organizataion. They want to find a better candidate, and who can blame them?
Bernie has about same politics as Hillary and he appears more honest.... and he gets many enthusiastic supporters while Hillary gets nearly ZIP.
But I bet the NYT wants someone else, if they can scare someone up. Biden had his chance but when you say you don’t want to run, it sorta lets most of the air out of your supporters’ sails. And, he’s made a fool of himself (even more so than usual) since that time. The FIS (Fake Injun Squaw) is a bad joke and the NYT knows it. She will be lucky to carry Massachusetts and maybe WashDC. If that.
I am betting D party forces like the NYT are working 24/7 to come up with someone else. (Who might it be?)
I wonder if the New York Times is wondering if the people they are polling are actually liars telling the New York Times they are going to vote for one of the biggest political liars of all time, Hillary, when in reality they will probably vote for some one more honest like Trump or some one else or not vote at all.
That just means DNC will need to spend a lot more money (than originally planned) to sign up more dead/illegals/inmates to vote for her.
By Golly! It is her time.
NYT gives New Yorkers a bad reputation.
I predict that heads will roll at all the major MSM networks when Benghazi Clinton loses ... they have been paid and warned if they don’t deliver ... they are paid propagandists and are expected to deliver.