This is interesting as some have been asking about the IT guy. Seems he provided information about the computer setup. No actual testimony.
Ready For Hillary. Where have I seen that before?
She’s failing to take out Bernie in the primary and become the nominee. I think that alone makes it more likely she will be indicted. The DNC and Obama are going to want her out of the way. Enter the Biden/Warner ticket.
Hillary will not be arrested and some more people will be found with suicide notes and bullet holes in the backs of their heads...
Yeah, the hole in which it will be buried is being dug deeper by the day.
Mark my words: they will simply delay until after the election. If she wins then it’s moot because you can’t indict a sitting President without impeaching first.
A few remarks DrDude:
"Title of Thread" box in the posting form is supposed to contain the EXACT title used by the source online, subject to being able to fit, to help people not post duplicates
"Body of Thread" box is supposed to contain an appropriate except from the article's text
"Body of Comments" box is for your personal take on the article.
It would be very helpful if FR's posting page contained better explanations of what is supposed to go into each field. Hope this helps.
Source here: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html
If the FBI hasn't YET found any evidence to prove Hillary violated ANY laws, KING 0DUNGA OWNS COMEY'S ARSE. Hillary placing her EMAIL SERVER USED FOR OFFICIAL GOV'T BUSINESS in a NON-GOV'T PRIVATE AREA IS ITSELF A FEDERAL CRIME.
The Clinton’s are protected for life by the press. Anyone who tries to take them down will get Ken Starred.
Yes...it is turning into Kabuki theatre.
Hillary just lost to Bernie Sanders.....again.
She is destroying the Democrat Party.
The Democrat leaders are calling the FBI and begging them to cart her off.
Our girl has done some bad things.
So that's the official MSM/Obama spin. Hillary didn't willfully break the law.
Never mind that she knowingly set up a private server that violated US intelligence laws.
Never mind that she disclosed classified information to persons lacking clearance.
Never mind that as a condition of employment she was expected to recognize classified information and handle it appropriately.
Never mind that "intent" does not matter in intelligence issues.
They are trying to figure out a way to package this mess to allow the DOJ to ignore the FBI findings. This is going to get ugly. Honest, informed Americans know she broke the law in a multitude of ways.
Have they really or have they pled the 5th?..........
YOU HAVE TO POST THE ACTUAL TITLE OF THE ARTICLE!
Thanks.
As I have noted before, political appointees have a staff, including a G-2/Security Officer, who are responsible for administrative duties to ensure proper handling/storage/sanitizing of classified sources. In my expereince, they rely on them heavily to make sure the i’s are dotted and t’s are crossed and often never open a safe or go on a classified information system personally. They may have their aide or security officer, or other staff prepare a classified briefing for them, but that person is responsible for the handling and storage. If Hillary asked them to strip out unclassified text of a message for her, or an unclassified summary that she could use in a public briefing, or even to use on an unsecured IS, they would take the fall if that was done incorrectly. They do this every day, and it is not at all uncommon for senior leaders to want unclassified snippets or summaries of information from classified sources. Likewise, if the aide (Huma) were asked to do this, she would take the fall. In my opinion, this is going to be nearly impossible to pin on Hillary. Someone or several someones may go down for it, but I don’t think it is because the FBI is being pressured to avoid Hillary, they are just going where the investigation leads them. On the other hand, the racketeering component of this, using her professional office to solicit/launder money through the Clinton foundation, that is the thing that she is probably worried about and would not be able to palm off on her staff. The cases where senior government personnel have taken the fall over mishandling of classified information have a common thread of those personnel operating outside of their staff to take home highly classified information, that was clearly highly classified, that was not secured properly and used in their domicile for unofficial use, and based on what I’ve seen so far, that doesn’t appear to apply here.