Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2016 3:04:38 PM PDT by DrDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: DrDude

This is interesting as some have been asking about the IT guy. Seems he provided information about the computer setup. No actual testimony.


2 posted on 05/05/2016 3:07:23 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

Ready For Hillary. Where have I seen that before?


3 posted on 05/05/2016 3:09:11 PM PDT by Yaelle (Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

She’s failing to take out Bernie in the primary and become the nominee. I think that alone makes it more likely she will be indicted. The DNC and Obama are going to want her out of the way. Enter the Biden/Warner ticket.


4 posted on 05/05/2016 3:09:41 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

Hillary will not be arrested and some more people will be found with suicide notes and bullet holes in the backs of their heads...


6 posted on 05/05/2016 3:12:21 PM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
Maybe something is actually happening with Hillary's Investigation!

Yeah, the hole in which it will be buried is being dug deeper by the day.

7 posted on 05/05/2016 3:12:39 PM PDT by Roccus (Fighting POLITICIANS is the true WOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

Mark my words: they will simply delay until after the election. If she wins then it’s moot because you can’t indict a sitting President without impeaching first.


8 posted on 05/05/2016 3:15:17 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
I hope I did this correctly. Not intending to break any rules.

A few remarks DrDude:

"Title of Thread" box in the posting form is supposed to contain the EXACT title used by the source online, subject to being able to fit, to help people not post duplicates

"Body of Thread" box is supposed to contain an appropriate except from the article's text

"Body of Comments" box is for your personal take on the article.

It would be very helpful if FR's posting page contained better explanations of what is supposed to go into each field. Hope this helps.

10 posted on 05/05/2016 3:17:17 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
"The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven't found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say. "

Source here: http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/05/politics/fbi-interviews-huma-abedin-clinton-aide/index.html

If the FBI hasn't YET found any evidence to prove Hillary violated ANY laws, KING 0DUNGA OWNS COMEY'S ARSE. Hillary placing her EMAIL SERVER USED FOR OFFICIAL GOV'T BUSINESS in a NON-GOV'T PRIVATE AREA IS ITSELF A FEDERAL CRIME.

11 posted on 05/05/2016 3:18:35 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

The Clinton’s are protected for life by the press. Anyone who tries to take them down will get Ken Starred.


14 posted on 05/05/2016 3:42:23 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

Yes...it is turning into Kabuki theatre.


27 posted on 05/05/2016 4:05:26 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

Hillary just lost to Bernie Sanders.....again.

She is destroying the Democrat Party.

The Democrat leaders are calling the FBI and begging them to cart her off.

Our girl has done some bad things.


30 posted on 05/05/2016 4:11:11 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven't found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say.

So that's the official MSM/Obama spin. Hillary didn't willfully break the law.

Never mind that she knowingly set up a private server that violated US intelligence laws.

Never mind that she disclosed classified information to persons lacking clearance.

Never mind that as a condition of employment she was expected to recognize classified information and handle it appropriately.

Never mind that "intent" does not matter in intelligence issues.

They are trying to figure out a way to package this mess to allow the DOJ to ignore the FBI findings. This is going to get ugly. Honest, informed Americans know she broke the law in a multitude of ways.

33 posted on 05/05/2016 4:15:37 PM PDT by Senator_Blutarski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
Says Huma and others have been interviewed.

Have they really or have they pled the 5th?..........

37 posted on 05/05/2016 4:18:49 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (#HillaryForPrison-2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude; Admin Moderator

YOU HAVE TO POST THE ACTUAL TITLE OF THE ARTICLE!


38 posted on 05/05/2016 4:20:59 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (MAGA! Make America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude
Please do not alter the title from the original. It breaks the Search function and causes multiple postings of the same article.

Thanks.

41 posted on 05/05/2016 4:25:03 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DrDude

As I have noted before, political appointees have a staff, including a G-2/Security Officer, who are responsible for administrative duties to ensure proper handling/storage/sanitizing of classified sources. In my expereince, they rely on them heavily to make sure the i’s are dotted and t’s are crossed and often never open a safe or go on a classified information system personally. They may have their aide or security officer, or other staff prepare a classified briefing for them, but that person is responsible for the handling and storage. If Hillary asked them to strip out unclassified text of a message for her, or an unclassified summary that she could use in a public briefing, or even to use on an unsecured IS, they would take the fall if that was done incorrectly. They do this every day, and it is not at all uncommon for senior leaders to want unclassified snippets or summaries of information from classified sources. Likewise, if the aide (Huma) were asked to do this, she would take the fall. In my opinion, this is going to be nearly impossible to pin on Hillary. Someone or several someones may go down for it, but I don’t think it is because the FBI is being pressured to avoid Hillary, they are just going where the investigation leads them. On the other hand, the racketeering component of this, using her professional office to solicit/launder money through the Clinton foundation, that is the thing that she is probably worried about and would not be able to palm off on her staff. The cases where senior government personnel have taken the fall over mishandling of classified information have a common thread of those personnel operating outside of their staff to take home highly classified information, that was clearly highly classified, that was not secured properly and used in their domicile for unofficial use, and based on what I’ve seen so far, that doesn’t appear to apply here.


51 posted on 05/05/2016 6:18:50 PM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson