Can you folks for once, examine the substance of a news items rather than reflexively responding to any news item that is negative of your Dear Leader?
I read this last night - long before you ever dredged up more yellow journalism 'fish.
Weighed and found wanting.
That others see it differently shouldn't bother you, if you are objective.
Redstate? The National Enguirer has more cred.
You can’t reason with cultists.
I reject your premise.
"...examine the substance of a news items rather than reflexively responding to any news item that is negative of your Dear Leader?"
I have examined it, and found it to be overwrought nonsense. Conversely, you don't seem to have examined it at all. You saw something that you perceived would reflect negatively on Trump, clutched your pearls tight, and ran with it.
You first.
I'll respond to the substance. Corey Lewandoski sounds like a guy who has experience, is effective and is loyal. I'd want him working for me. His disadvantage for Cruz would be that he doesn't have any demonstrated snake handling ability.