“About you?”
Not just about me.
“Where and what?”
Frequently enough and in numerous enough places.
“So again you thank God for the killing of Prots.”
No. I said inquisition. That doesn’t mean a single “killing” need result. See how you twist things? See how you just posted a completely false statement? Yeah, you do it frequently enough as I said.
“Why should be even bother attempting reasonable exchange with such a arrogant advocate?”
Well, since I never said what you just accused me of saying the first thing you should bother with is an apology for that false statement of yours. Also, since I am the only one between us who has most likely ever read a book or a scholarly article about the inquisition your only option for a “reasonable exchange” about the inquisition may be me. You don’t have to like it. It’s about true. It’s not about what you like.
And, again, you posted a completely false statement about me. You really should apologize - especially since I just got done telling you that, “You repeatedly posted false statements.” Thanks for proving me right yet again.
Prove repeatedly posted false statements, frequently enough and in numerous enough places. No doubt this is "you said the Catholic church is not the one true church" type of propaganda, or such vain attempts such as charging that "sanctioned by Rome" must expressly mean the Bishop of Rome vs what the its American bishops may officially do.
“So again you thank God for the killing of Prots.” No. I said inquisition. That doesn’t mean a single “killing” need result. See how you twist things? See how you just posted a completely false statement? Yeah, you do it frequently enough as I said.
So supporting the inquisition does not mean supporting all its official means? That's desperate and contrary to what support infers. You thanked God that there was no Spanish Reformed Sect because the Spanish Inquisition was up to the task, and as the Spanish Inquisition tortured and killed souls, if far less than the often alleged millions, then it means supporting killing of some Prots, and likely potential ones, and using the fear of which to prevent such. Trying to say your support of the Spanish Inquisition does not support a single killing (why even the parenthesis?) is in-credible.
Well, since I never said what you just accused me of saying the first thing you should bother with is an apology for that false statement of yours.
What?! So you deny thanking God that there was no Spanish Reformed Sect because the Spanish Inquisition was up to the task? Or weasel out of this as including support of killing Prots? But tell you what, if you will state that you do not support the killing of any Prots by the Spanish Inquisition then i will apologize for presuming your support of the Spanish Inquisition included that. Fair enough?