The Commish is 100% correct. No one in the city needs a gun. Not until the second they REALLY, REALLY, REALLY need one.
When danger is 3 feet away, the police are on patrol 2 miles away. Best of luck.
Actually when danger is 3 feet away, it’s already too late.
My prayer when first holding my first gun, “May this NEVER, EVER be NEEDED. Used for practice but never NEEDED.”
Consider how much $ and energy the left has put into disarming regular Americans. Its been going on for many many decades. Why is disarming you so important? The left, on rare occasions, admits the goal isnt safety. They’ll also admit the goal isnt to completely eradicate guns from our society. Their goal is to allow guns in the hands of a few chosen and govt. What would they have in store for us that guns would interfere with? Why are they so ardent in the quest to disarm you? Things to carefully ponder...
And you can keep your doctor if you like them.
***nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle***
Not the first time gun confiscation has happened in Boston!
Following the first shots of the American Revolution at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, on April 27, the military governor of the Province of Massachusetts Bay and commander-in-chief of all British forces in North America, General Thomas Gage, ordered all firearms owned by the Boston citizenry stored in Faneuil Hall.
On April 27, “1778 fire arms, 634 pistols, 973 bayonets and 38 blunderbusses” were received, properly labeled with the names of the owners, and sorted for storage at Faneuil Hall.
Gage promised the weapons would be returned to their owners “at a suitable time”. Gage feared an attack on Boston was imminent and feared the civilian populace would join in the resistance, confronting him with an inner and outer enemy. - See more at:
http://www.bostonteapartyship.com/faneuil-hall#sthash.YKTLRImT.dpuf
I don’t believe the guns were ever returned to their rightful owners.
Unless Obama and/or Comrade Clinton unequivocally state before the cameras: "I ADVOCATE CONFISCATING GUNS"..
It cannot be said that they advocate confiscating guns... or to quote the Leftist directly:
AlCum there's nowhere in there that Hillary says "I advocate confiscating guns" or any similar word construction that would mean that.
And on Comrade Clinton's answer on the Australia's forced gun “Buyback”:
AlCum "...worth considering..." is NOT ADVOCATING GUN CONFISCATION. It's illiterate cr.... like yours that has the mass of low info sheep on whom the right wing relies all hotted up in a lather even though no one, not Hillary or Obama, has advocated any gun confiscation.
So rest assured, until they actually use the 'C' word we have nothing to worry about.... and talk of Bans, repeals of the 2nd amendment, and other words that are Synonyms of the word confiscate: impound, seize, commandeer, requisition, appropriate, expropriate, take possession of, sequester, sequestrate, take away, take over, take.
Does not mean the Gun grabbers want to grab guns.
Besides, when has the national Socialist Left ever Lied before?
[/sarc. just in case it's not obvious]