Posted on 01/29/2016 9:32:47 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
If Americans have learned anything about the zealots who claim to seek “common sense†solutions to the non-existent epidemic of gun violence it’s that they will never be satisfied until Big Brother has stripped every law abiding gun owner of every weapon.
Last week, Coach is Right published “Nobody Wants to Take Your Guns,†an article which reveals the true intentions of 2nd Amendment foes from the late Senator John Chafee to Handgun Control Inc, prior to its transformation into the Brady Bunch. And the agenda of the left has not changed over the years.
During a recent appearance on Boston Public Radio (WGBH), Boston Police Commissioner Bill Evans said:
“For the most part, nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle and… especially here in the city I want to have discretion over who’s getting any type of gun because public safety is my main concern.â€
Evans puts the arrogance of the left on full display as he presumes to decide what gun owners need and what, if anything, they should be permitted to have. Imagine the outcry should a conservative claim the authority to decide whether liberals need to speak and what, if anything, they should be permitted to say! What? Treat First Amendment rights with the same degree of contempt liberals have for our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms?
Most Americans have caught on to the fabrications of our Liar in Chief as he declares his respect for the 2nd Amendment. During his campaign against John McCain, Obama said “I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.†Some three weeks ago, the left succumbed to a state of rapture over Obama’s shedding of crocodile tears as he announced his Executive Orders against
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
The Commish is 100% correct. No one in the city needs a gun. Not until the second they REALLY, REALLY, REALLY need one.
When danger is 3 feet away, the police are on patrol 2 miles away. Best of luck.
Actually when danger is 3 feet away, it’s already too late.
My prayer when first holding my first gun, “May this NEVER, EVER be NEEDED. Used for practice but never NEEDED.”
Consider how much $ and energy the left has put into disarming regular Americans. Its been going on for many many decades. Why is disarming you so important? The left, on rare occasions, admits the goal isnt safety. They’ll also admit the goal isnt to completely eradicate guns from our society. Their goal is to allow guns in the hands of a few chosen and govt. What would they have in store for us that guns would interfere with? Why are they so ardent in the quest to disarm you? Things to carefully ponder...
And you can keep your doctor if you like them.
Methinks they’re just honestly holoplophobic. They truly just fear guns, and think they should just go away via prohibition.
On the whole they don’t have a nefarious scheme in mind to disarm the population to further oppressive goals. There is, however, a natural consequence that once the population _is_ disarmed (purely a matter of public safety to them), they will independently discover that opposition to tyranny has been eviscerated, and they proceed to inflict their will on others accordingly.
A few, of course, do see the connection and are trying to leverage it. For most, however, it’s just axiomatic that nobody but the state should be armed - they can’t comprehend good people having guns, and won’t act on their “celebrate diversity”.
***nobody in the city needs a shotgun, nobody needs a rifle***
Not the first time gun confiscation has happened in Boston!
Following the first shots of the American Revolution at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, on April 27, the military governor of the Province of Massachusetts Bay and commander-in-chief of all British forces in North America, General Thomas Gage, ordered all firearms owned by the Boston citizenry stored in Faneuil Hall.
On April 27, “1778 fire arms, 634 pistols, 973 bayonets and 38 blunderbusses” were received, properly labeled with the names of the owners, and sorted for storage at Faneuil Hall.
Gage promised the weapons would be returned to their owners “at a suitable time”. Gage feared an attack on Boston was imminent and feared the civilian populace would join in the resistance, confronting him with an inner and outer enemy. - See more at:
http://www.bostonteapartyship.com/faneuil-hall#sthash.YKTLRImT.dpuf
I don’t believe the guns were ever returned to their rightful owners.
Disagree.
THEY want the guns. They just don’t want you to have them.
Predators prefer unarmed Prey. Rulers prefer unarmed Peasants.
That's easy, if you know history. They want to KILL YOU.
‘There is, however, a natural consequence that once the population _is_ disarmed (purely a matter of public safety to them), they will independently discover that opposition to tyranny has been eviscerated, and they proceed to inflict their will on others accordingly.’
So you think theyll only discover this after the fact and havent already figured it out?
Most of them, yes. They won’t see the connection, just the opportunity.
And most of them don’t see the problem. In their view, nobody should have guns without good reason, and they’re the only ones with good reason. You’re one of the revolting peasants, and they’re the special little snowflakes that deserves.
So, let talk about those who have figured it out. Who are they and do they hold places of power and influence in our society?
They fear guns that are not under their own control.
Unless Obama and/or Comrade Clinton unequivocally state before the cameras: "I ADVOCATE CONFISCATING GUNS"..
It cannot be said that they advocate confiscating guns... or to quote the Leftist directly:
AlCum there's nowhere in there that Hillary says "I advocate confiscating guns" or any similar word construction that would mean that.
And on Comrade Clinton's answer on the Australia's forced gun “Buyback”:
AlCum "...worth considering..." is NOT ADVOCATING GUN CONFISCATION. It's illiterate cr.... like yours that has the mass of low info sheep on whom the right wing relies all hotted up in a lather even though no one, not Hillary or Obama, has advocated any gun confiscation.
So rest assured, until they actually use the 'C' word we have nothing to worry about.... and talk of Bans, repeals of the 2nd amendment, and other words that are Synonyms of the word confiscate: impound, seize, commandeer, requisition, appropriate, expropriate, take possession of, sequester, sequestrate, take away, take over, take.
Does not mean the Gun grabbers want to grab guns.
Besides, when has the national Socialist Left ever Lied before?
[/sarc. just in case it's not obvious]
I thoroughly disagree with you that there is the slightest trace of honesty in anything about disarming the populace.
When we look at Pol Pot, Stalin, the NAZI's genocides of particular groups of their citizens, we are disgusted appalled and horrified. When the left look at these things they see something entirely different. They see a society where their ideas can be implemented without any resistance, and when they look at the failues of their evil ideas EVERY TIME THEY'VE BEEN TRIED, they think, "but that wasn't with me in charge. They just didn't go far enough."
So you can assign honesty to them, but I assign evil intent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.