Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNBC’s Televised Show Trial
Canada Free Press ^ | 10/30/15 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 10/30/2015 8:16:54 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

GOP candidates face a firing squad manned by leftist journalists

The Republican presidential candidates’ debate on CNBC wasn’t so much a debate as it was a firing squad manned by left-leaning journalists.

Over and over journalistic equivalents of, “When did you stop beating your wife?” were asked of the candidates.

The reporter-moderators weren’t just asking questions: they were prosecuting the candidates at a televised show trial. Personal attacks were disguised as questions. (Here is a transcript of the at times boisterous 10-way main debate, along with a transcript of the four-way undercard debate that preceded it.)


TOPICS: Government; Politics; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cnbc; debate; debates; elections; gopcandidates; leftistjournalists; mediabias

1 posted on 10/30/2015 8:16:54 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I think in 120 seconds....Cruz destroyed CNBC’s credibility. But it fortells the potential destruction possible if Cruz makes it to October of 2016 as the Republican choice, and has to face Hillary.

Cruz might just sit there...grin, and say he’ll let her pick the moderators completely. Then as they lay into him....he’ll step aside of Hillary and destroy the moderators instead of her.....pointing them as ‘5th-grader pretender thugs helping poor Ms Clinton out’.

This was his show....he took the moderators down, and didn’t even build up a sweat.


2 posted on 10/30/2015 8:21:38 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

All of these so called “debates” are a complete waste of time. Merely a rediclous bull session which tells us nothing about the candidates. I have watched my last.


3 posted on 10/30/2015 8:24:40 AM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

That is a pretty good analogy.

The “moderators” at RNC debates are prosecutors.

The “moderators” at DNC debates are defense attorneys.

But they are never moderators.


4 posted on 10/30/2015 8:26:14 AM PDT by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

According to a survey of media done in 2004, it was determined that almost 90% of media professionals voted for John Kerry that year.

Just recently, Joe from morning Joe also said that 9 out of 10 people in the media support Democrats. I think the idea that there is media bias is getting out there in the world.

Of course liberals see nothing wrong with the format and questions of the CNBC debate. How would they like to see a Democrat debate moderated by the likes of Mark Levin, Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Krauthammer, and answer some pointed questions put to them? Mark Levin would ask some great pointed questions I’m sure. I wonder how the liberals would feel about such a “debate” if Hillary were put on the spot.


5 posted on 10/30/2015 8:32:58 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Trump’s put down of moderator Becky was memorable.


6 posted on 10/30/2015 8:33:55 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I think the establishment Republicans set this one up because they thought that their “nice” candidates would hold up better than the conservatives shooting off their mouths. Boy they were wrong. Conservatives are itching for a fight and want to elect a fighter.


7 posted on 10/30/2015 8:56:03 AM PDT by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Fox Business channel won’t be any kinder.


8 posted on 10/30/2015 8:58:34 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Well I don’t have a teevee, so I read the transcripts.
Seems to me the “undercard” debate questions had substance.
And Jindal got applause.
Cue the “Get me a slurpee, Bobby” comments in 3...2...


9 posted on 10/30/2015 9:10:49 AM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future; brother it is murder. -L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Soviet Show Trial:


10 posted on 10/30/2015 9:11:02 AM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
DEBATE
11 posted on 10/30/2015 9:21:44 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The moderators last names should have been Vishinsky, Yezhov, and Yagoda.


12 posted on 10/30/2015 9:23:37 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson