The SC guy kept saying 97% of scientists.....even mentioned Union of Concerned Scientists once. At one time I read over the list and qualifications of those “scientists” in the union. Pitiful pedigrees in large part - mostly nothing to do with any expertise in so-called AGW. IOW, a political science degree or history degree does not a “scientist” make.
Reminds me of the so-called 400 Constitutional Scholars who took out a full page NYT ad in 1998 that effectively said “..a Bl@w J@b is not an impeachable offense...”
Let's see names, who they are, who pays them and who do they know....
97% is a ridiculous number which can only be obtained "with bias".
Thanks for the reference. They are indeed just an arm of the EPA. Scientists my a**.
Sorry don’t know abbreviations, what is IOW and Bl@w J@b. ?
Here is his letter of acceptance....
That survey was done at a Global Warming convention and has no validity to reality, yet quoted over and over.
Pray America is waking