Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RaceBannon

They got upset because Lincoln represented a purely sectional party, the idea of which the founders had always dreaded. Lincoln was not anti-slavery. He was in favor of passing an amendment which would make it impossible for Congress to touch the slavery issue. He was also a white supremacist who believed that blacks would never the social equals of whites and was in favor of returning all blacks in America to Africa.


256 posted on 07/13/2015 3:22:25 PM PDT by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

no, Lincoln was so anti-slavery he ran on a party whose main platform was anti-slavery

your verbal gymnastics will throw out your sacroiliac if you’re not careful


263 posted on 07/13/2015 4:54:58 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

“He was also a white supremacist”

Who belonged to a newly formed abolition party?

Yeah yeah sure sure.


268 posted on 07/13/2015 6:29:10 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
He was also a white supremacist who believed that blacks would never the social equals of whites...

Tell me one leader of the time, North or South, who didn't?

270 posted on 07/14/2015 3:52:42 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson