Ah the moral superiority argument. Got it. As long as someone is guilty of one thing they are guilty of everything.
Ok, let’s follow your feeble contention -
From 94 - Personally I am happy to give criminal bike gang thugs the same rights they give their victims of terrorizing, intimidation, denying others the right to association, beating someone with a hammer for some ‘rocker’, murdered for ‘disrespecting’, selling kids the really bad drugs like crack/meth/heroin, stealing and destroying peoples property. Oh, and how about the rights of the girls they force into prostitution?
When they begin respecting everyone else’s rights, they can have theirs back. Otherwise as long as they and any of their sniveling groupies are presenting themselves in public dressed like and acting like hoodlums, they will be treated as hoodlums they so diligently try to portray.
Although that is pretty much Law of the Jungle, how does that not make your incontinent reply incorrect?
Your moral superiority argument is most valid. Those that do break the law, or who violate other citizens civil liberties are certainly morally deficient.