Ok, let’s follow your feeble contention -
From 94 - Personally I am happy to give criminal bike gang thugs the same rights they give their victims of terrorizing, intimidation, denying others the right to association, beating someone with a hammer for some ‘rocker’, murdered for ‘disrespecting’, selling kids the really bad drugs like crack/meth/heroin, stealing and destroying peoples property. Oh, and how about the rights of the girls they force into prostitution?
When they begin respecting everyone else’s rights, they can have theirs back. Otherwise as long as they and any of their sniveling groupies are presenting themselves in public dressed like and acting like hoodlums, they will be treated as hoodlums they so diligently try to portray.
Although that is pretty much Law of the Jungle, how does that not make your incontinent reply incorrect?
Your moral superiority argument is most valid. Those that do break the law, or who violate other citizens civil liberties are certainly morally deficient.
And knock off the ad hom bullshit. If I am a “fanboy” of anything it is the rule of law. How will you feel when church goers are singled out for being anti homosexual and given the same treatment? That day is on the horizon.