NRA: Gun blogs, videos, web forums threatened by new Obama regulation

washingtonexaminer ^ | June 7, 2015 | Paul Bedard

[arthurus]

I like that!

[familyop]

I think that’s a good idea, but they’ll follow and possibly restrict communications done through any protocols, bands or electronic devices. A hard copy newspaper is the most legally secure way that I can think of, although electronic publications should have been legally defended as much.

We shouldn’t have even allowed the propaganda ploy of using the word, blog, to describe and debase individual websites. Individual website publications should enjoy full First Amendment protection.

[arthurus]

There is no “should” anymore.

[familyop]

True.

[Godebert]

Looks more like George C. Scott to me.

[Godebert]

You actually believe the republicans give a rat's @ss about our Constitution? They would have never allowed an illegal usurper to become the commander-in-chief if they did.

"The citizenship of no man could be previous to the declaration of independence, and, as a natural right, belongs to none but those who have been born of citizens since the 4th of July, 1776."....David Ramsay, 1789.

[Lazamataz]

We are reaching the Go Signs.

[Lazamataz]

And we all know the GOPE won’t stop it

It's okay. I will.

[Lazamataz]

I will be one of the premiere waterboys.

[PROCON]

You and me both, Laz, I’ve ‘effin had it!

[Lazamataz]

I ain’t got a wife, and no kids, so I am free and clear to act.

[sport]

No, I don’t.

[GregoTX]

"And we all know the GOPE won’t stop it"

They have a solid track record of not stopping anything since they took congress.