Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/16/2015 3:52:39 PM PDT by Duke C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: Duke C.

Yutes drop cement blocks on trains fairly often. How many trains disintegrate as a result?


3 posted on 05/16/2015 3:55:27 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

Shoot a BB gun at a car and see if it crashes.


4 posted on 05/16/2015 3:55:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

Want to derail a train?You would have to attack the tracks.


5 posted on 05/16/2015 3:56:08 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

The answer is no. If you fire at a train from the inside of a curve you would have a chance but you would need a very large object with lots of force to move a multi-ton train (think tank). News reports talk about something that broke a window.

The train was going twice the speed it was supposed to be traveling. That’s what caused the accident.


7 posted on 05/16/2015 3:57:17 PM PDT by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

First you should review your physics.


8 posted on 05/16/2015 3:58:49 PM PDT by Rio (Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.
my physics is rusty

That would be entropy.

Why do you want to square v?

9 posted on 05/16/2015 3:58:49 PM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

A derailer attached to the track can do the job easily.


10 posted on 05/16/2015 3:59:23 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.


11 posted on 05/16/2015 4:01:08 PM PDT by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

So what if there were a projectile.

That does not explain why this engineer was going 106 MPH in a 50 MPH
zone.


12 posted on 05/16/2015 4:01:34 PM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

That would be one Billy Bad Ass that could throw a 15# bowling ball at 88FPS.


13 posted on 05/16/2015 4:01:34 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

A physic was what my Mom gave us when we were constipated.


14 posted on 05/16/2015 4:03:48 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.
Could a heavy object cause a train derailment? Basic physics states that F+MV² ( force= mass times velocity squared) Let's say a thug tosses a bowling ball at Amtrak 188, presently moving at 70 MPH. That would be 15LBS times 88FPS which would equal 1,742,000 foot pounds of energy. Don't know if this is right, my physics is rusty. Anybody?

Wow, a number of issues here. Force of bowling ball has to be subtracted from the mass and momentum of the train... and whatever's left has to be applied against the coefficient of friction connecting the train to the tracks plus the physical blockage of trying to move the weight of the train across the edge of the entire rail... train shocks are going to absorb a lot and make the carriage sway instead of flip sideways... and the distribution of force from the bowling ball is going to have an effective limit depending on what it hits - a reinforced steal frame member versus a window or sheet metal, the latter just making a hole the size of the ball, the former perhaps exceeding the integrity of the bowling ball itself and shattering it... all in all, holding up a thumb and squinting, I'd say... no.

15 posted on 05/16/2015 4:05:46 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

Your math is not only rusty it’s wrongly applied. That’s not how you calculate energy.

Never mind any calculation, just know that the the energy transferred to the bowling ball by the train is about 100,000 times greater than the energy transferred to the train by the bowling ball.

In a train vs. bowling ball contest here is the result:

Bowling ball - dust
Train - dent


18 posted on 05/16/2015 4:07:00 PM PDT by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

Pretty sure F = ma


19 posted on 05/16/2015 4:08:04 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

You better go relearn some basic physics. F does not equal MV-squared.


23 posted on 05/16/2015 4:16:38 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

There is no debate. 106 MPH says it all. A train runs on a track. It’s not like you have to keep in a lane like a car. He was distracted or dozed off and missed a warning.


27 posted on 05/16/2015 4:22:05 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.
Let's say a thug tosses a bowling ball at Amtrak 188, presently moving at 70 MPH. That would be 15LBS times 88FPS which would equal 1,742,000 foot pounds of energy.

The ball's kinetic energy would be

0.5*15*(70*5280/3600)**2 = 79,053.3 foot-pounds

or about 0.0298 kilowatt-hours.

28 posted on 05/16/2015 4:22:15 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

A car weighs a hell of a lot more than a bowling ball and would very rarely, if ever, derail a train. What derails trains is excessive speed in a turn for the bank angle, or problems with the rail. Loose rail, gap, foreign object attached to it, etc.


31 posted on 05/16/2015 4:25:48 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.

F=MV\2 = republican’s fault


37 posted on 05/16/2015 4:32:41 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Duke C.; All
Oh, well. Might as well get some rock on.

You're welcome!

38 posted on 05/16/2015 4:32:50 PM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson