what’s the supreme court going to do if the administration simply refuses to abide by their decisions?
the founders never considered the possibility that the person holding the job of president would be so brazen about their disregard for the Constitution.
I think they never realized we would be so polarized that members of the president's party would not vote against him for ANY reason.....
I asked that exact question repeatedly 8 years ago when the "Manchurian Candidate" permanently left his mask at home.
We still don't know who this guy is.
And Congress doesn't seem inclined to pass a watertight statute concerning eligibility for office and immediate remedies for Constitutional abuse.
Remember, that Congress has the ability to limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
What we need are candidates for congress not bereft of both IQ and ethics.
“the founders never considered the possibility that the person holding the job of president would be so brazen about their disregard for the Constitution.”
I would differ with you there. The founders certainly did consider the possibility and as a result they gave us a couple of remedies. One is Article 5, the other is the 2nd Ammendment.
The key is if we as a people are willing to execute our Duty and Responsiblity!
Of course they did.
What they did not allow for was a Congress that would so thoroughly abdicate all of their responsibilities.