Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Early Concealed Carry Before Permits (photo)
Gun Watch ^ | 23 February, 2015 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 02/24/2015 6:10:21 AM PST by marktwain


Many have speculated on the reason for the hand inside the coat pose of officers during Civil War photographs.   Perhaps it was to render access to a concealed weapon.  These, after all, were military officers.

Is that the bulge of a Smith & Wesson #1 under his left arm?  It is about the right size.   The number one was one of the first easily concealable cartridge pistols.  It was first produced in 1857 and was in great demand by officers in the Civil War.


As a .22 short, we might not think of it as having much stopping power.  But considering the extreme reliability and convenience of the cartridge compared to the percussion arms of the era, seven quick shots would have been very attractive. 

Many speculations have been made about the classic hand in the jacket pose.  Some speculate that it was meant to mimic Napoleon.  Others proclaim that it kept the hand still, or that the man was keeping his hand on his wallet.   Those seem unlikely, given that the pose has been said to be popular with Romans and their tunics.   Considering what happened to Ceasar, a Roman tunic would be a handy place to hide a dagger.

So here is another speculation as to why Civil War soldiers are often seen with their hand in their jacket.   They were keeping it close to a concealed weapon.

©2015 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; civilwar; concealedcarry; smithwesson
I am sure that some Civil War troops carried concealed weapons.
1 posted on 02/24/2015 6:10:21 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Some have claimed it’s a popular Masonic pose for men of a certain rank...

I haven’t a clue, personally.

Could have just been the vogue of the times.


2 posted on 02/24/2015 6:13:41 AM PST by BlueNgold (Have we crossed the line from Govt. in righteous fear of the People - to a People in fear of Govt??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

I believe it has a lot to do with the famous portrait of Napoleon. Unlike Hitler or Stalin, Napoleon was widely admired by the public, due to his military achievements. Keep in mind that the United States fought Britain, Napoleon’s main protagonist, during the War of 1812.


3 posted on 02/24/2015 6:23:33 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Back then one had to remain still for quite a while for a photo portrait. Maybe it's just a way to keep your arms still so the photo isn't blurred.
4 posted on 02/24/2015 6:29:52 AM PST by 4yearlurker (Some people say that experts agree!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
I think it was a style thing. In fact a lot of them seem to have developed their own standard poses for posed pictures.

George Armstrong Custer had a distinctive arms crossed pose in most of his later pictures but it looks like he developed it over time.

His first photo as a cadet.



There are other poses but the arms crossed pose seems to be most common for him.


5 posted on 02/24/2015 6:35:15 AM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
They were just emulating this guy: It was the usual pose.
6 posted on 02/24/2015 6:45:05 AM PST by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

Most daguerreotype studios had prop pistols & muskets for their soldier subjects to be photographed with.

Derringer pistols were already in wide use by the Civil War.


7 posted on 02/24/2015 6:47:47 AM PST by elcid1970 ("I: am a radicalized infidel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

True, as percussion arms. There were percussion pepperboxes and small revolvers as well.


8 posted on 02/24/2015 8:08:47 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

kewl


9 posted on 02/24/2015 11:23:35 AM PST by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

So much for Rules 1 through 4.

10 posted on 02/24/2015 11:40:16 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

The original purpose of concealed carry was to enhance the element of surprise. That is still valid today. It has nothing to do with the “Oh my God! He /she has a gun!” crowd.


11 posted on 02/24/2015 1:15:12 PM PST by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson