Posted on 02/07/2015 11:34:57 AM PST by rightistight
In a stunningly evil and disgusting article, a feminist only willing to identify herself as “Lana” has described her decision to abort her child, based solely on the fact that he was a boy.
Lana begins her article by explaining that “the patriarchy has been well entrenched since the dawn of time,” and continues by writing about an argument she had with a man on an airplane, while she was pregnant, to summarize what she deemed “extreme patriarchy.”
The description of the argument is straight forward: Lana was flying to San Francisco to participate in an Occupy Wall Street rally. When the person sitting next to her found out about it, he swore at her, to which Lana responded by screaming at the top of her lungs “ASSAULT.”
After “contemplating” lying to the flight attendants and telling them that the man struck her, Lana decided to tell the truth. The flight attendants told her that they couldn’t force the man to move in response. And in response to that, Lana decided that she “could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.”
The “cause,” in her mind, is feminism. Soon after, she went to the doctor and was told that she was pregnant with a boy. Her immediate response, she writes, was “my body had betrayed me even worse than the misogynistic suit jockey on the airplane so many months before. I was in shock, I started crying, weeping at the thought of what I was about to curse the world with.”
Over the course of several days, she decided that she could not bring another male into this world. She explains, “I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
How do we even know she is not just making this up? For whatever reason, maybe just to get people riled up. Should we believe everything we hear on the internet?
This is one of those propagandist articles designed and distributed to change how people think and act about a particular subhject by telling an outrageous lie for shock value, its a basic component of incrementalism. Here she gets people to think about “patriarchy” and plants the thought that its evil and makes women think they are all victims of men. This in turn weakens the status of men who are regarded as guardians and protectors against evil. Evil needs to remove us because we are an obstacle to their progressive goals and agendas. Its an evil story to the core but I thinks its fiction and she’ll be identified and proven to be a liar shortly.
“If any of you offend one of these little ones I say unto you better for that man that he had never been born.”-Jesus of Nazareth.
To you who are knowledgeable in theological matters can such a person who “offends a little one”be saved?
I believe the only thing that keeps one from being saved is blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.
The only positive thing from that abortion, is that, her genetic material won’t be passed on to any descendants. Purification through her own monstrous and destructive mindset.
All liberal women should think and act like she does.
Sounds like the guy probably had a very good reason to swear at her.
She was probably ranting about some lunatic left-wing cause and he had enough of it.
I didn’t want to “like” them to read the rest of the story, but I’m heartened by the comments. Unless they got an sudden influx of right wingers over there even the “social justice” community finds this woman abhorrent.
My favorite of the ones I read was the woman who hoped the author’s daughter grows up to be a Christian fundamentalist who bears five sons who love to fish and hunt. She just said it with a gay good humor, if you know what I mean.
uber-feminist on an anti-male jihad
Which nobody knows what it is.
Assuming the story is even true.
Sick, sick, sick woman.
I really hope the abortion left her unable to conceive ever again. No one deserves a monster like that for a mother, even if she deigns to allow a child to live sometime in the future.
Good insight into the “mind” of a raging, man-hating, fang-tooth feminazi.
I don’t wonder that this pathetic coward will not give her name.
fits the narrative of a Super Bowl ad
I’m going with the “Immaculate Confusion.”
presumably she likes men at least occasionally?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.