[gdani]

They may despise them but it does not mean they will not vote for them.

Just wait until mid-2016 around here when all those same people who currently say they will never vote for RINOs, the Republican Party, etc change their tune & start calling people traitors for not voting for the GOP.

In other words, just like we saw in 2012.

[itsahoot]

They may despise them but it does not mean they will not vote for them.

I am Shocked That
you think that.

[Finny]

gdani notes: They may despise them but it does not mean they will not vote for them. Just wait until mid-2016 around here when all those same people who currently say they will never vote for RINOs, the Republican Party, etc change their tune & start calling people traitors for not voting for the GOP. In other words, just like we saw in 2012.

Yep. But in 2012, I thought "we" -- that is, gdani, those of us who refuse to vote for Republican tyranny as the price (extracted out of pure fear-mongering) of participating on the pretense of voting "against" Democrat tyranny -- I thought that "we" were the minority and that Romney would (God forbid) win.

I underestimated Free Republic's accuracy of representing the real heartbeat, of common sense moral America. They voted such that Romney lost.

If I read it correctly this time, already ... lots and lots of folks are waking up to the con game they're subscribing to. They are a quiet majority, if what I see on FR is reflective.

So very ironic to call going "third party" a "sucker's bet" because "it'll only hand it to the Democrats."

The REAL sucker's bet is voting for an amoral Republican who is virtually entirely on-board philosophically with the pro-government tyrannical Democrat agenda. Good patriotic Americans are figuring that out the fool's game of voting for either tyranny a or tyranny b.

*sigh*