Posted on 11/13/2014 12:03:45 AM PST by marktwain
California Poll:
Do you think self-defense is good enough cause to be issued a concealed weapons permit?
This is a straight yes or no question, and it is getting a clear response. It is about 6-1 in favor of second amendment supporters at this time. The question is based on the resolution of the Peruta decision, which says, in a straightforward way, that the second amendment protects the right of a person to carry arms outside of the home for self defense. The result of the decision is that California permit applicants will not be denied a permit at the whim of the chief law enforcement officer of a jurisdiction. A number of California sheriffs have been to issuing permits on a "shall issue" basis for years, but the large urban centers in San Diego, Los Angeles, and San Francisco have consistently refused to issue nearly all permits, except for those politically connected.
Do you think self-defense is good enough cause to be issued a concealed weapons permit?
Yes 85% (546 votes)
No 14% (93 votes)
The Link for the poll is here
On line polls measure the ratio of those who are interested enough to answer an online poll. The results here are typical. Second Amendment supporters typically outnumber those who push for more restrictions by 3-10 to 1. In this case the ratio is now 6-1 ratio. This poll is asking a clear question about the legitimacy of self defense. Those who want more restrictions on guns must delegitimize self defense, or they lose.
©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch
BTTT
Hence my tagline.
[Video] DC Permit Process, Cop Says 2nd Amendment is For “When the British Are Coming”
November 13 2014
by Dan Cannon
Share This Post
DC News FOX 5 DC WTTG
Let’s see, do I make a lewd joke about British porn based on the cop’s comments in this story or do I take the high road and just get right into why The District of Columbia’s new carry permit process is an absolute joke.
I guess we’ll take the high road like we always do here (but please feel free to use your imagination on the British jokes).
Investigative reporter Emily Miller, who literally wrote the book on gun rights in our nation’s capitol (see Emily Gets Her Gun), who is now a reporter with My Fox DC, attempts to obtain a permit to carry in Washington and the results are about what was expected.
What she found (and what most people already assumed) is that it’s pretty much impossible to get a permit to carry in DC. DC is currently a “may issue” district, which means you must prove you need a permit and it’s up to the authorities to decide if that need is legit.
Miller tried to argue that since she lives, works, and travels in one of the highest violent crime areas in the country (Washington DC) that she needs a permit. However, the officer she spoke with said that wasn’t good enough.
Here are some of the comments from the officer she dealt with:
“You need to meet two criteria,” Agurs explained. “First that your life is in danger, your family or your property, or you have the type of business you carry large sums of money, jewelry. Under those circumstances, you can get a carry permit in DC.”
“To prove my life is in danger?” I asked. “Obviously there is a rising crime rate and a high rate of murders and sexual assaults in D.C. — is that enough to say I want this for self-defense?”
“You have to prove you need concealed carry as opposed to just wanting one,” he replied.
Prove a need for a constitutional right? That’s what D.C.’s new law says.
The application that Agurs gave me said that living and working in a high crime city is not enough to get a carry permit. I read further down where it says that it has to be “a special danger to your life.”
What’s the difference between a regular danger — like getting raped and murdered on the street — and a special danger? You have to prove you are being targeted.
“Do I have to give evidence?” I asked.
“Yes ma’am,” said Agurs.
“I was a victim of a home invasion. And I’ve gotten a threat against me. Do I just give the police records?” I asked.
“Yes, ma’am,” he said.
Perhaps the worst comment came when a police employee argues that the Second Amendment was written during a time when “the British were coming” (#BritishPornJokes). Of course anyone who passed American History (and paid a little bit of attention) knows, the Bill of Rights was ratified well after the Revolutionary War. Well, except that guy.
Is a car really needed if you live near the bus line?
You don’t need that freedom as much as we need to save the Erf and the children...
Down to 84%! I did not expect this one to drop! Maybe it will come back up.
Better yet pound the back of their head repeatedly on a concrete sidewalk then ask that question.
It’s breathtakingly disgusting that the question even needs to be ASKED, much less that people actually believe concealed carry has ANY OTHER PURPOSE!!!
In CA no less......
Is self-defense a good enough reason to be issued a concealed weapons permit?
Yes 87% (2573)
No 12% (351)
Total votes2924
Yes- 87% 3302 votes.
No- 12% 463 votes.
Live free or die.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.