One doesn’t simply turn over evidence to a court. It has to be submitted and then either ruled admissible or not. In this case the government lawyers will argue that its hearsay, one mans opinion. Believe me i think it sucks in this case but the use of his words are no slam dunk,
One doesn’t simply turn over evidence to a court. It has to be submitted and then either ruled admissible or not. In this case the government lawyers will argue that its hearsay,
__________________________________________________
I bet if the lawyers investigate they will find that Gruber was in the group that designed, crafted, and wrote the deception into the bill. The administration had these wonks working on the bill.
In this case, the tapes and papers of Gruber stating that people who purchased insurance from the federal exchange would not receive subsidies has been part of this case since last June or July. Gruber has been trying to claim that the one written paper was a typo, which it obviously was not. The Democrats have been trying to downplay Grubers’s role in designing the law, saying that he didn’t have a full understanding of the legislative intent.
This tape shows that the intent was to deceive and lends credence to accusation that the architects of the bill intended to deceive the “stupid voters by telling them that if their state refused to create an exchange, the voters of that state would not receive federal subsidies.
I want to know if Ezekiel Emanuel was in attendance at that meeting at the University of PA, since Dr. death is head of patient services at the hospital..