Skip to comments.
This is what a voting "glitch" actually looks like...
CRASHR ^
| 11-6-14
| The Looking Spoon
Posted on 11/06/2014 11:06:51 AM PST by The Looking Spoon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: The Looking Spoon
When I went to vote my polling place had large signs all over the doors stating that “Photography and Video Recording are PROHIBITED on this premises. Turn Off Cell Phones!”
Had never seen these signs before in 15 years of voting there.
NOW I know WHY!!!
To: The Looking Spoon
It doesn't matter who votes.
What matters is who counts the votes - and in this case, who maintains the electronic voting machines.
We find that out, and I'll wager we won't be surprised at their party affiliation.
3
posted on
11/06/2014 11:10:51 AM PST
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: The Looking Spoon
Suzanne D. Patrick (42%) LOST to Scott Rigell (57.9%). LOL!! Nice try, Dems.. CAUGHT, blue-handed.
To: Buckeye McFrog
Notice the AP insist Warner is ahead by 17,000 not 10,000 the Commonwealth says it is. Why? Well, 0.5% triggers an automatic recount. Wanna guess what 0.5% of two million voters is? You guessed it. 10,000.
5
posted on
11/06/2014 11:12:56 AM PST
by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: The Looking Spoon
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
To: grobdriver
This would mean more if he hit an inch above his selection to see if it really is a calibration issue. Not to say that it couldn't be a purposeful calibration issue.
It's also funny at the lib sites they are complaining of Dem votes going to the Pubbies on these machines.
8
posted on
11/06/2014 11:14:57 AM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Photography and Video Recording are PROHIBITED on this premises. Turn Off Cell Phones!
I wonder if that's really enforceable.
9
posted on
11/06/2014 11:16:36 AM PST
by
V_TWIN
To: TangoLimaSierra
Yeah, well, one side has proof now...
To: The Looking Spoon
They call it a glitch when in reality it’s a programming error (or deliberate choice). A glitch is an unexplained, one time problem caused by a hardware malfunction.
11
posted on
11/06/2014 11:17:49 AM PST
by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
To: TangoLimaSierra
A high-profile group such as Judicial Watch should do a nationwide investigation and see if ANY of these 'glitches' marked Republican votes. If ALL of them switched to the Democrat, "Houston, we have a problem" and this would defy the laws of statistical probability and would render these 'glitches' willful programming maneuvers.
THE PROGRAMMERS SHOULD BE TRACKED DOWN AND PROSECUTED. Can these machines be hacked remotely/wirelessly?
To: TangoLimaSierra
I saw a story about a claim in Greensboro North Carolina, any other locations? BTW: they offered even les evidence than this gif image.
13
posted on
11/06/2014 11:24:31 AM PST
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: The Looking Spoon
Consider what the makeup of Congress would be now were ther no voting fraud. Consider Maryland where fraud, non-citizen voting and other more traditional fraud, probably accounts for north of 10% of the vote and they elected a Republican governor. Without Fraud the modern Democrats would represent a much smaller portion of the country.
14
posted on
11/06/2014 11:25:19 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: grobdriver
It doesn't matter who votes.
What matters is who counts the votes - and in this case, who maintains the electronic voting machines.
We find that out, and I'll wager we won't be surprised at their party affiliation.
My understanding is that a Soros affiliate owns/leases produces those machines. Anyone confirm?
15
posted on
11/06/2014 11:26:36 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
16
posted on
11/06/2014 11:27:15 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: The Looking Spoon
Yeah, well, one side has proof now...And I don't expect any evidence from their side.
17
posted on
11/06/2014 11:34:49 AM PST
by
TangoLimaSierra
(To win the country back, we need to be as mean as the libs say we are.)
To: TangoLimaSierra
Well, I can only say while I don’t condone cheating, I only wish our guys had the gumption to even try to cheat to win. They seem pretty content with losing. They won Tuesday in spite of themselves.
18
posted on
11/06/2014 11:38:00 AM PST
by
riri
(Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
To: The Looking Spoon
... why are these glitches always found in favor of Democrats?
I have noticed that same thing. I do not recall ever seeing a voting machine complaint that the machine only picks the Republicans.
==
I have also posted that, if casinoes can program gambling equipment to produce a certain number of wins, then programming voting equipment would not be much different.
19
posted on
11/06/2014 11:40:02 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
I imagine at some time in the future they will.
I suspect the dems, in order to avoid being labeled conspirators, will have false flag machines set up, to be "found".
These machines will be in unimportant races, in low turn out areas, where the effects won't matter.
Imagine numerous machines, being found in heavy republican areas, where a republican win is almost guaranteed. They won't swing an outcome, but they'll deflect attention from the strategically placed machine, in favor of a democrat.
20
posted on
11/06/2014 11:40:28 AM PST
by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson