Skip to comments.
The police-detecting Target Blu Eye device; Police see red over gizmo that blows their cover
The [UK] Sunday Times ^
| 10-22-2014
| Dominic Tobin
Posted on 10/26/2014 9:22:40 PM PDT by Bettyprob
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: servo1969
That is the one I have...
41
posted on
10/27/2014 6:23:49 AM PDT
by
Raven6
(Psalm 144:1 and Proverbs 22:3)
To: Raven6
If it has an antenna, it can be detected. It is a matter of how bad you want to, and what you’re willing to spend to do it.
42
posted on
10/27/2014 6:54:02 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: USMCPOP
Resistance is futile
(if < 1 ohm)
43
posted on
10/27/2014 7:13:51 AM PDT
by
zeugma
(The act of observing disturbs the observed.)
To: Gaffer
So all antennas transmit even thought they are just listening?
How is that?
Thanks,
Ed
44
posted on
10/27/2014 11:50:40 PM PDT
by
Sir_Ed
To: Texas Eagle
I want a device that identifies a cop, by name, including social security number, immediate family names and locations, house, price of house, all firearms and ammunition registered to the cop, web browsing history, pets names and ages and present locations, and sexual predilections.
By facial recognition.
45
posted on
10/29/2014 6:35:11 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
To: Texas Eagle
It is LONG STANDING PRECEDENT that you can RECEIVE any transmission in the spectrum.
That’s all this is doing.
46
posted on
10/29/2014 6:36:58 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: USMCPOP
47
posted on
10/29/2014 6:37:22 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: TaxPayer2000
“Next thing you know they will be telling us we cannot use our eyes or ears to detect when the police are nearby.”
And not far behind that, they’ll just stop everyone and demand we give them all the money we have on our person under “asset forfeiture” rules.
To: RFEngineer
....and then all our nude “selfies”
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson