Posted on 10/15/2014 9:55:10 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
There is no crime in being up front with honesty and practices of fairness in vote casting when truth replaces theft of honor by deception
In the past several years, elections, local, regional and national in particular have seen lawlessness at the voting polls in many areas of these once-squeaky-clean United States. And even when definite proof is available, such as the case in Ohio, where the number of votes for Democrats in the ballot tallies exceeded the total number of all eligible residents, Democrat, Republican, and all other voters registered in that area.
A very simple (and simple minded) case of the Party of Democrats breaking the law by having illegal persons casting votes or, even simpler, having their pawns visit different polling places and vote for Democrat candidates as many times as they can get away with doing so.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Which would have happened if all of the corrective measures were in place.
When someone took these findings to the proper authorities they were rebuffed, probably by a democrat judge.
"The only correct claim is that some districts in Philadelphia recorded 100 percent of their votes for Obama a stat that isnt a mathematical and statistical impossibility, as the email claims, and isnt all that surprising once the full context is known."
I have served as a precinct chair and election judge for all of the presidential elections since 2000. I can tell you that the only way 100% could possibly take place is if there was voter fraud.
The reason why it is a statistically impossibility is that in every precinct someone is on the voter poll who is bonafidely dead and cannot possibly physically vote. There are always a few people who are out of town and did not vote early. There are people who do not vote because they do not want to be called for jury duty. In any one so-called black precinct there is going to be at least one person who does not like democrats.
If 100% means that everyone happened to show up and vote, that is impossible.
If 100% means that all those voting voted for Obama, well that is so impossible that even Factcheck had to make a positive kerfuffle about it.
****************
There wasn't 106,258 votes in Wood county. The vote was as follows:
Wood 100.0% Reporting | B. Obama (i) | Dem | 51.0% | 31,596 |
---|---|---|---|---|
M. Romney | GOP | 46.8% | 28,997 | |
G. Johnson | Lib | 1.4% | 896 | |
J. Stein | Grn | 0.4% | 262 | |
R. Duncan | Una | 0.2% | 115 | |
V. Goode | CST | 0.1% | 58 | |
S. Alexander | Soc | 0.1% | 43 |
Did they think that no one would notice?
That is pretty bold. It looks like a small group of organizers got busy a few days before the election, because it is really hard to illegally mark ballots the day of the vote.
It helps if you get all your buddies on board to mark ballots ahead of time.
And it helps if you make sure no one of the opposing party is working the polls that day.
And it helps if somehow you can intimidate the poll watchers or make it so they don't see any of your work.
And it really helps when you are found out that you have someone in authority who can throw off any legal action that just might come your way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.