Posted on 10/14/2014 8:51:51 PM PDT by OddLane
Many Americans seem to think that free speech and the First Amendment are synonymous. They're not: the former is a larger and more primal concept. But one consequence of that confusion is that, whenever free-speech questions arise, you always get a ton of emails droning, "There's no First Amendment issue here, Steyn. Mozilla/Brandeis/A&E/whoever is not the government. It's a private entity and is perfectly free to can its chief exec/disinvite Ayaan Hirsi Ali/suspend 'Duck Dynasty'/whatever if it wants to."
Which is true as far as it goes, but doesn't address the core question of ugly thuggish identity-group enforcers remorselessly narrowing the bounds of permissible public discourse.
Still, for all those First Amendment pedants out there, consider this story from Houston, Texas:
(Excerpt) Read more at steynonline.com ...
I absolutely LOVE this guy, love his style, love his writing, his wit. Wish I could meet him.
Ebola Gay. Hah, Steyn’s funny.
Ok, here’s an idea from the pea-NUT gallery.
We want bi-partisan “cooperation”, right ?
So let’s run a bi-partisan Presidential ticket !
Al Franken and Mark Steyn.
Yes, vote the Franken-Steyn ticket.
“The most effective way of making everybody serve the single system of ends toward which the social plan is directed is to make everybody believe in those ends.”
“It is not difficult to deprive the great majority of independent thought. But the minority who will retain an inclination to criticize must also be silenced.”
” . . . the plan itself in every detail, in fact every act of the government must become sacrosanct and exempt from criticism.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.