“Being ordered about what Im allowed to do with this infection “
Pretty much sums it up, although in the case of herself and her ilk, she may be correct!
I normally oppose excerpting blogs.
But after reading such a huge amount of pukeage in such a short excerpt; I’m glad you didn’t go any further.
Pro-death feminists are evil. Pure evil.
There is no reasoning with a woman who is still this selfishly immature.
I used to think that if you could convince someone that the fetus is a person then they would have to agree that abortion is murder. However, it turns out that we can arbitrarily decide that corporations are 'persons', that historic houses are 'persons', etc. in order to protect their rights.
But in the case of fetuses, even if we as a society decide to declare them 'persons', we could also decide that the personal rights of the mother outweigh the personal rights of her child.
I urge you to read Thomson's entire essay (know thy enemy and all that) to see how the other side rationalizes their behavior.
Odd how the man has no interest till it’s born,
then has to support it for 18 years weather he
gets to raise it or not.
These “women” are really sick.
Notice to Fetus’, study womyn’s studies in the womb,
then you’ll be worth saving...poetry in the womb, hahaha.
Yes little girl, you’re right; killing unborn children is...health care! Yeah, that’s the ticket.
I do have autonomy over my body—to a point. Suppose I visit a friend who is a mother of an infant. If I take into my arms that infant, then I have an obligation to protect that infant until I can get it into a place of safety. I do not have the right to just drop it to the floor should I decide I no longer wish that burden I voluntarily took up. The law holds me responsible. I see little difference in pregnancy. There’s more inconvenience but, as far as I am concerned, the obligation is the same.
They claim the fetus (or alien being from their analogy) is an uninvited parasite. That’s not true. Having sex, especially unproteted sex is very much inviting a pregnancy. I believe that is why we are made with REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS.
The concept of Autonomy precludes any consideration for the Creator and our relationship to Him, which is never by any means “autonomous,” no matter how much we as creatures believe or think otherwise. The premise that a woman is autonomous is wrong from the start. She is a shining example of what it means to be a creator in her own right, bearing offspring wholly dependent upon her for life and being. There is no greater manifestation of evil thought and deed than that which denies life and being to others.
If a woman can’t legally put heroin in her body - or a butt bomb that would explode and kill other people - then the whole legal premise of “my body, my choice” is sheer myth.
PZ Myers is a joke. A very bad one.
He has a daughter. His daughter blogged frequently until a few years ago. One of the things that made her stop was a blog post containing her completely honest defense of bestiality.
PZ, of course, is a well known evolutionist, and his daughter (last I heard) was a rabid atheist like her dad and a radical feminist to boot. It’s funny to me that according to PZ Myers’ own philosophy, his genetic line is doomed.
It couldn’t happen to a nicer guy. /sarcasm