[null and void]

They need to be drug tested. Especially for ‘roids.

In a just country, there would be MANDITORY drug and alcohol testing of any officer involved in a lethal encounter with the public.

A locomotive engineer or bus driver shouldn't have stricter rules than a cop!

[x1stcav]

‘In a just country, there would be MANDITORY drug and alcohol testing of any officer involved in a lethal encounter with the public.’

That is the perfect way to frame this argument.

[Ezekiel]

In a just country, there would be MANDITORY drug and alcohol testing of any officer involved in a lethal encounter with the public.

Sent off or administered by...?

Yancy, a veteran who suffered from PTSD...

Cops sharing databases with the VA? Scratch another veteran off that waiting list!

[shotgun]

You mean like this “brave man in blue”:

http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2014/05/05/2958021/benton-county-deputy-resigns-after.html

Headline: Benton County deputy resigns after steroids found in home

Read more here: http://www.tri-cityherald.com/2014/05/05/2958021/benton-county-deputy-resigns-after.html#storylink=cpy

[motor_racer]

Why do we wait until someone dies? LEO’s carry lethal force every day, and exercise authority in ways that can easily intimidate even the most law-abiding. They should be tested daily, with zero tolerance. One and done.

[Robert Teesdale]

COLD

Commonsense Oversight for Law Enforcement Drug Use

Every state should have a COLD group getting ballot initiatives organized:

"Any sworn officer involved in a lethal force incident must submit to a blood and urinalysis drug test within 24 hours."

Obviously, lawyered-up to be legal-languaged, but it would be a joy to watch law enforcement try to explain why they SHOULDN'T be drug-tested immediately after killing someone.

After all, if they have nothing to hide, why refuse? Right? Play their own damn game.