Posted on 03/13/2014 2:04:33 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
A House Republican bill aimed at forcing President Barack Obama to enforce immigration and other laws as they are written drew sharp rebukes Wednesday from the White House and House Democrats, who ripped the measure as anti-immigrant.
The legal dispute over President Barack Obamas unilateral decision to suspend deportations for people brought to the country illegally by their parents, known as dreamers, has split the GOP and Democrats before.
But on Wednesday the dispute threatened to end any lingering goodwill Democrats were inclined to extend toward GOP leaders, who just weeks earlier unveiled a set of immigration principles for overhauling the nations broken system and then said Obama needed to earn back the GOPs trust that he would enforce the law.
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney weighed in from the podium, where he spoke of House leaders interest in an immigration overhaul in the past tense.
Carney said the GOPs legislation runs contrary to our most deeply held values as Americans and asks law enforcement officials to treat these dreamers the same way as they would treat those with criminal records.
You hear a lot of talk about where people are on this issue. It doesnt require much to look at what House Republicans are doing today to question whether or not theyre serious about moving forward on comprehensive immigration reform, he said.
But GOP leaders said Congress needs to act to curb what they consider to be Obamas abuse of power on a broad scale.
His administrations blatant disregard for the rule of law has not been limited to just a few instances, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said on the House floor. From gutting welfare reform and No Child Left Behind requirements to refusing to enforce immigration and drug laws, the presidents dangerous expansion of powers appears to be endless. Whether one believes in the merit of the end goal or not, this is not how the executive branch was intended by our founders to act.
The House passed a bill 233-181 on Wednesday that would authorize the House or the Senate to bring a civil lawsuit against the White House for executive overreach.
The president doesnt get to decide which laws hes going to enforce any more than Americans get to decide which laws theyre going to follow, Speaker John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement. The fact that the president would threaten to veto a measure requiring him to uphold his Constitutional obligations underscores why this bill is needed, and why Senate Democrats should pass it immediately.
On Thursday, the chamber will vote on an additional measure forcing federal officials to justify to Congress each time they opt not to enforce certain laws.
Democrats backing an immigration overhaul were livid.
I want to read to you from the Republican principles on immigration, said Rep. Luis V. Gutiérrez, D-Ill., during floor debate on Wednesday. This is what your caucus put forward. One of the greatest founding principles of our country was that children would not be punished for the mistake of their parents. It is time to provide an opportunity for legal residents of citizenship for those brought to this country as children through no fault of their own and no other place. Yet today you want to take away that very ability from the president of the United States.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., who like Gutierrez has been a leading voice in pushing for a comprehensive immigration overhaul, also weighed in.
We have had one vote on immigration here in Congress. It was on Congressman Kings bill to deport the Dream Act kids, said Lofgren on the Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, amendment that the House passed last year to override Obamas executive action to defer the deportations of dreamers.
Lofgren also wondered why the House had not yet seen legislation reportedly in the works from Cantor and Judiciary Chairman Robert W. Goodlatte, R-Va., tentatively titled the Kids Act, that would help dreamers avoid being penalized for being in the country illegally through no fault of their own.
Weve heard a lot of discussion about a bill supposedly thats going to be brought forward by the majority about the innocent children whove been brought here, she said, but we havent seen a bill. Instead, we see these bills.
I don’t know what this thread is about, I just wanted to post a Welcome back to FR.
You can sure tell when the RATS get scared.
Its like kicking over a hive of killer bees.
The illegals are not being punished, they are simply being returned to where they belong
Yes, how dare they require him to actually fulfill his oath of office.
On the other hand, wouldn’t him vetoing a bill requiring him to do that be pretty much instant grounds for impeachment (like there aren’t plenty of grounds already)?
More window dressing. Boehner knows this won’t go anywhere in the Senate. That’s why it came to the House floor.
The House has the power of the purse. Defund Baraq’s pet agencies. Take action that means something.
LOL.
Only leftist presstitutes could come up with this kind of spew.
“........drew sharp rebukes Wednesday from the White House and House Democrats, who ripped the measure as anti-immigrant.”
Democrats have more BS in them than watermelons have water.
“the dispute threatened to end any lingering goodwill Democrats were inclined to extend toward GOP leaders”
Uhh?! What freaking ‘goodwill’ are they talking about?!
That isn’t biased at all.../s
“asks law enforcement officials to treat these dreamers the same way as they would treat those with criminal records”
Dreamers = ILLEGALS = Criminals
Illegal means something to some of us!
“Only leftist presstitutes could come up with this kind of spew.”
Exactly!
Laugh-out-loud line of the week, so far. :)
Emma Dumain
Can Cantor Deliver on Voting Rights Act?
"After two trips to the Deep South alongside civil rights icon and Georgia Democrat John Lewis, the pressure is the pressure is on Eric Cantor to deliver on the Voting Rights Act.
Steven Dennis @StevenTDennis · 9m
Carney: "We remain hopeful" House will act on a comprehensive immigration bill
“- - - - The House passed a bill 233-181 on Wednesday that would authorize the House or the Senate to bring a civil lawsuit against the White House for executive overreach. - - - - “
This is a start, next is Impeachment of Hussein Soetoro-Obama.
Yeah, if the parents were bank robbers would it be punishing the children to give the money back to the bank?
So if my parents robbed a bank for few million. I am young teen.My parents give to me all the money.Then advise me to buy cars,houses,etc,etc,per One of the greatest founding principles of our country was that children would not be punished for the mistake of their parents. I should be allowed to keep all the money ,cars,houses,etc,etc.. Not be at fault for the mistakes of my parents
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.