They forgot the most important part:
"When the husband is watching the football game and snaps his finger, it is the duty of the wife to immediately stop what she is doing and dutifully retrieve for him an ice cold beer from the fridge.."
Because a cucumber can’t mow the grass.
This will only end badly for women. The fig leaf delusion they cling to now is only the product of stable social relationships and the productivity of men. If both sexes reject each other in favor of narcissistic pursuits women will ultimately lose because the fundamental purpose of marriage is to protect as well as love. Decline into social chaos and women will become meat. These fools are merely tuning their fiddles for a performance we’ve seen before.
Who else is gonna take out the trash ...
Talk to the catz!
They forgot the most important part:
"When the husband is watching the football game and snaps his finger, it is the duty of the wife to immediately stop what she is doing and dutifully retrieve for him an ice cold beer from the fridge.."
Without a husband, who will women blame their problems on?
Because they’re busy raising sons who will need husbands?
Women don’t need husbands.
They only need checkbooks.
Men just coincidentally come with them.
Well, there has been a recent discovery about the female brain circuitry in the news, in general of course - doubt such a thing would apply to the average Freeperette. ;)
There is nothing wrong with women wanting careers.
There is a huge problem with women thinking that they do not need men or a stable relationship, especially if they want children.
Things can happen. What if she has small children and learns that she has a terminal disease? What happens with the children? If a father is around, she does not need to worry because he will still be there for them. But if the father is an anonymous sperm donor, or a one-time hook-up, what happens?
I have known two women in that exact scenario. One was a successful single college professor who learned that she had an inoperable brain tumor when her son was 5 years old. So not only was she dying, she had to find someone to raise her son. The other was a married sailor who developed a brain tumor when her daughter was 2 years old. She passed, but the daughter still had her father.
There are also the studies that show that children raised in single parent homes do not do as well as children in two parent homes. Why purposefully disadvantage a child in this manner?
men are superfluous...
Word alert word alert!
Who put this big word on my teleprompter?
Be content with your lot. Men have adjusted.
Perhaps that’s because men can’t produce life the way women can—let’s face it: those are some serious shoes to fill—but they can produce the means to make a child’s life secure. As a nation, we dismiss this integral part of masculinity. But that doesn’t make it any less true.
Democrats have sought to replace men/husbands with Big Government. Look at the advertising for Obamacare, et al, targeted to women. Look at Hillary's "it takes a village to rise a child" meme.
(ok, sporadically .. d:^)
Every time one of these articles comes out, it’s just a sign that women are growing more desperate, and therefore mens’ organic response to feminism is having the desired effect :)
On a Trans-Atlantic flight, a plane passes through a severe storm. The turbulence is awful, and things go from bad to worse when one wing is struck by lightning.
A female passenger jumps up frantically and announces, “If I’m going to die, I want to die feeling like a woman.”
She asks, “Is there someone on this plane who is man enough to make me feel like a woman?”
A man stands up, removes his shirt and says, “Here, iron this and get me a beer!”.
I love men-—I want a husband!
kg/nancy