Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/07/2013 9:41:17 AM PST by SERKIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: SERKIT

Sign me up ASAP.


2 posted on 01/07/2013 9:43:57 AM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

My family fought against British tyranny at the Battles of Cowpens and King’s Mountain. If tyranny needs to be resisted today, O’m sure there are enough Americans who will step forward to challenge it.


3 posted on 01/07/2013 9:46:02 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Children, pets, and slaves get taken care of. Free Men take care of themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Let's pray that it never comes to that but as always....

Be vigilant and keep your powder dry....

5 posted on 01/07/2013 9:48:26 AM PST by nevergore ("It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

We are past the point of what the Founder’s intended the Second Amendment to rectify and return liberty into the hands they worked so hard to enshrine, should it ever be usurped from them.

A ‘revolution’ today would be a bloodbath and more in-line with the French experience with revolution than what our Founders were engaged in.

Sad fact of history and the moral make-up of this people today.

A fact known by the MarxoFascists, who NEED a bloodbath in order to succeed in completeness where they are taking us.


10 posted on 01/07/2013 9:56:18 AM PST by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Ubama's "fundamental transformation" is designed to be a slow-motion train-wreck.

At some point, probably after about six-months of triple-digit inflation, riots will start in the inner-cities when the amounts on the EBT cards aren't covering trips to the casinos like they used to.

Whoever survives the following five years wins the "revolution."

I don't think Ubama is going to be among them.

11 posted on 01/07/2013 9:56:18 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the government. LIBERTY: When the government fears the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

Gotta rout the media first.


13 posted on 01/07/2013 9:58:23 AM PST by Boiling point (Socialism; Ideas so good they have to be mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

Might want to start a UHF/VHF net first.


16 posted on 01/07/2013 10:14:09 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

The leaders would be labled terrorists, placed on the president’s kill list, which is now legal, and the sight of predator and reaper drones crisscrossing our skies would become commonplace.


18 posted on 01/07/2013 10:15:50 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

One never knows what precipitating events may occur that lead to acts of liberation from threats to the well-being of the nation as a whole and seek to overthrow a ruling elite and corrupt cabal of politicians and wealthy and the misguided who benefit most with the ‘status quo’..

Taxes, guns, suicide attacks.. take your pick.

Nope, no one knows.. but we’ve seen numbers of all of them go thru the roof this millenium.. Progre$$ive agendas don’t come cheap, yaknow.


19 posted on 01/07/2013 10:16:20 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Let me point out an important difference between 1776 and 2012. George III was a dictator, elected by no one. Obama was elected by millions of Americans.

I very much suspect that there was voter fraud in the last election. Add to that all the media bias. And, to be polite, much of what Obama is doing bends the Constitution.

But Obama won a relatively free election. He is the people's choice. This is not 1776. Obama is VERY bad for this country, but he is not George III (yet).

25 posted on 01/07/2013 10:24:34 AM PST by Leaning Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Stick To Your Guns
27 posted on 01/07/2013 10:30:47 AM PST by SENTINEL (I lie, I cheat, I steal, I communize, I sacrifice unborn babies, I'm Harry Reid and I'm a mormon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

My 5th great-grandfather, John Carpenter, was George Washington’s neighbor near Mt. Vernon, travelled with him during his survey of the Western Reserve, fought with him in the French and Indian War and the Revolution.

I pray I have some of those genes in me as I suspect I’ll need them in the coming days.


29 posted on 01/07/2013 10:38:47 AM PST by Dick Bachert (An ARMED society is a POLITE society!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Obama’s Lawless Presidency

January 7, 2013

-By Warner Todd Huston

President Obama’s supporters love to call him the “cool” President, a “no drama” guy, and generally like to claim he is unflappable in office. Whatever the truth of that claim, there is one thing for sure: he doesn’t sweat the small stuff. Like following the law. During his four years in office this president has shown he couldn’t care less about the laws he’s supposed to be governed by as president.

This lawlessness started all the way back before he even became president. It was widely discussed in 2008 that he blatantly violated campaign donations laws by refusing to put in controls on his website that would prevent illegal, foreign donations. And we’ve only just learned as 2013 began that his 2008 campaign was levied the largest fine ever imposed on a presidential campaign for violations of campaign laws. In January the nation learned that the FEC fined Obama $375,000 for campaign reporting violations.

Once he became President, Obama immediately began misuse his powers to control Washington’s regulatory machinery to pay back pals and warp rules for ideological reasons. This president generally wields his regulatory powers with kid gloves to pay off supporters while at the same time that velvety hand holds a cudgel to smite foes.

One of his very first moves when he was swept into Washington, for instance, was to begin a program to give big payoffs to his union masters.

His first move was to put a union operative in as the head of the Department of Labor. Hilda Solis had been a union stooge her entire career and that stoogery only increased when Obama took office and quickly put her in charge of the DoL. This is significant because the DoL is supposed to be an unbiased arbiter between labor and the business sector. Installing Solis as the Sec. of Labor signaled a move to turn the DoL into an adjunct of Big Labor instead of an unbiased arbiter and Solis quickly moved to use the DoL as a weapon against the business sector.

Immediately Obama changed union reporting rules that cut unions slack in reporting their financial situation to the government. No more would unions be expected to account for themselves. Instead, unions would be given all the cover they needed to hide funds and expenditures from both government and union rank and file members.

This wasn’t his only pay off to unions. He’s continued to bend rules, vacate laws, dismantle transparency regulations, and turn a blind eye to union violations during his whole time in office.

Obama has also used Executive Orders to skirt both Congress and the law. Take for instance, Obama’s attempt to implement the Disclose Act through the back door using an EO. The Disclose Act was an effort that failed in Congress but Obama thought he could just ignore Congress and implement it anyway.

This fits with Obama’s announced policy that he would go around Congress whenever he feels like it.

Obama has also engaged in a strong campaign to misuse the Department of Justice for political purposes. His emplacement of Eric Holder as Attorney General was only the first move to turn the DoJ into a weapon against Americans he doesn’t like. Writer and former DoJ lawyer J.Christian Adams has chronicled the extensive damage Holder’s DoJ has done to the country with his and Obama’s politicization of the department.

In fact, the DoJ has been so ideologically pro-active that this month the federal government has been told to reimburse the state of South Carolina for court costs the DoJ unnecessarily caused as it illicitly attacked the state over its voter ID laws.

Obama has used the Environmental Protection Agency as a weapon repeatedly, as well. In only the latest example we find that a federal court has determined that the EPA overstepped its boundaries by idiotically claiming that water is a “pollutant” in order to force its will on state officials.

Another example of Obama’s disinterest in following the law was his responsibility to report his upcoming regulatory changes, the last report of which was due in October but wasn’t bothered with until December — conveniently after the election. The earlier April report he never issued at all.

Then there was Obama’s convenient change to the way the federal government defines poverty. Obama changed it so that poverty can never be shown to have gotten better. His new reporting scheme will forever define poverty as getting worse despite its actual condition either ways.

Obama also recently made a move to eliminate an embarrassing metric in the gathering of statistics issued by the Internal Revenue Service that shows how many Americans are moving, from where, and where to among the states. One can only assume the gathering of this metric was ended so that the steady flow out of highly taxed, deep blue states can no longer be tracked. In this way, Obama can help tax-hogging Democrats hide the fact that their policies are causing their states to lose citizens as those put upon folks move away to more prosperous, and usually lower taxed, states.

Sadly, no president before Barack Obama has violated the law, warped the regulatory scheme, and used his power to as ideologically as often as he has. None.

Suffice to say, there are many, many, many more examples like those I’ve listed here. There have been so many that it would take a book — or several — to chronicle all Obama’s ideological changes and violations of the law committed since 2008.

In fact, a few have made the attempt to elucidate that record.

To name just two, the aforementioned J. Christian Adams wrote a book titled Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department, detailing the abuse of power at the DoJ.

Another good book on Obama’s lawlessness is Phil Kerpen’s Democracy Denied: How Obama is Ignoring You and Bypassing Congress to Radically Transform America – and How to Stop Him.

Obama’s lawlessness is so voluminous that even the book titles about the subject can’t be short! And he isn’t done yet, either. Thanks to the American electorate, he has another full four years to indulge his lawlessness.

“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that he wrote articles on U.S. history for several small American magazines. His political columns are featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com, BigHollywood.com, and BigJournalism.com, as well as RightWingNews.com, RightPundits.com, CanadaFreePress.com, StoptheACLU.com, AmericanDaily.com, among many, many others. Mr. Huston is also endlessly amused that one of his articles formed the basis of an article in Germany’s Der Spiegel Magazine in 2008.

30 posted on 01/07/2013 10:48:40 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
Put yourself in our founders shoes. At what point did they feel it was necessary to shoot back and take a life of what they considered their own countrymen or regulars?

'He' (as the founders called him or our government in our case) would have to start executing the good and honest people as they did to our founders.

39 posted on 01/07/2013 11:12:55 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

I sure wouldn’t be planning it or talking about it online or anywhere else out in public. Treason has consequences....even the founders understood that


45 posted on 01/07/2013 11:28:15 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT; Eaker

Yep.

Glum prospect and costly. Worth it?

Hell yes, if needed.


51 posted on 01/07/2013 11:45:18 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

Some people here are incredibly optimistic about the prospect. The last Revolution was a close thing, with no guarantee the colonists would win.

I wouldn’t be too cheerful about taking on the military head on. And if you kill civilians, you will alienate the public.


53 posted on 01/07/2013 11:58:54 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT
"What if a revolution is required....?"

There is no "IF" in the equation, and further the opposition will decide what type "IT" is to be.

58 posted on 01/07/2013 1:00:54 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

Theoretically, the revolution is late in coming!
Yes, the citizenry will be the ones responsible.
However, I do think that many of ‘da city-zens’ wouldn’t do anything, but attempt to frustrate the operations necessary to remove the foul cancer in the body American. If that frustration ever began to fester, (yes, I know what I’m saying!), until the operations can continue to save this nation, a possible vermin eradication may have to happen, first.


60 posted on 01/07/2013 1:43:25 PM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

I agree with this blog post the guerrilla war would be urban:

- What will be the likely model of american insurrection, if “gun control” doesn’t “go well?”
http://wintersoldier2008.typepad.com/summer_patriot_winter_sol/2012/12/what-will-be-the-likely-model-of-american-insurrection-if-gun-control-doesnt-go-well.html


62 posted on 01/07/2013 3:38:20 PM PST by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson