Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Obama & Crowley Know Questioner/Question Beforehand?
www.theconservativetreehouse.com ^ | 10/19/2012 | Unknown

Posted on 10/19/2012 2:32:01 PM PDT by TexasNative2000

This isn't my blog - I just came across it via Twitter. I have been reluctant to think that Crowley and Obama were working off a script....until now.

There is a lot on this blog that, in my opinion, doesn't point to any pre-knowledge. However, the second point that is made, and supported by video, is that Obama knew who the questioner was regarding the Benghazi attack BEFORE the questioner identifies himself.

The audience is surrounding the candidates in a 180' arc, but Obama turns and looks right at the questioner, then catches himself.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: hmmm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: TomGuy

Hmmmm... Interesting point.


21 posted on 10/19/2012 3:10:25 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 ("You can either limit growth or limit government. We choose to limit government." Paul Ryan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

If the GOP wins in a landslide, take control of House, Senate and WH, an inquiry should be made of the MSM to determine their rationale on poll samples and how they conduct the debates. If questions were given to Obama, then the public needs to know that and the channel discredited in public. Same goes to MSM poll takers. How can you claim one candidate is ahead by oversampling his party by 12 percent? Then find out what the motive is behind such malpractice. The poll company can either publicly admit incompetence or spill the beans that the client wanted to create news and not fact with skewed polls. All these issues affect public interest and consumer right to accurate info and not manipulation.


22 posted on 10/19/2012 3:12:42 PM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

See the video. The imposter in chief knew exactly where to look.
Was the “debate” fixed?


23 posted on 10/19/2012 3:22:26 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Only people with their head up their a$$ vote democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

1. Why did Candy have transcripts of Obama’s Rose Garden Speech with her at the debate?

2. How did Obama know that Candy would have transcripts of his Rose Garden Speech with her at the debate?

‘Nuff said.


24 posted on 10/19/2012 3:22:49 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Obama didn't fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

That certainly seems to be the case here...


25 posted on 10/19/2012 3:23:30 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 ("You can either limit growth or limit government. We choose to limit government." Paul Ryan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
I tend to think the Ladka was a set up because he asked about the least damaging part of the Benhazi issue. He asked about the security screw up, and the blame for that is pretty easy to foist on the underlings. If you had an audience member raise the issue of the disparity in the stories about the attack, that would have been much more difficult for Obama to get nasty on if it came from an audience member. Besides I saw Ladka later on Greta and he's a big time socialist regarding Obamacare. Yet he plugs his company like he's a true capitalist. He appears to to be the perfect any man citizen just concerned about this attack thingy. I'm sure it went over well with the rubes.
26 posted on 10/19/2012 3:25:48 PM PDT by throwback (The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: throwback
Great point - bring up the issue, but bring up the part that's easiest to swat down.

Also, if you check further down that blog, you can see where Ladka is using Twitter to beg onto any cable news show that will take him. #attentionwhore

27 posted on 10/19/2012 3:28:53 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 ("You can either limit growth or limit government. We choose to limit government." Paul Ryan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

Of course that whole thing was a setup. His indignation, and the whole Rose Garden thing was in response to Candy’s question of does the buck stop with him or Hillary? Wasn’t even a response to the original questioner? Remember the leaks prior to it that he was gong to take responsibility for it at the debate. Lo and behold Candy lobs the softball up there for him. He didn’t do it during the original question, he did it to Candy’s question.


28 posted on 10/19/2012 3:47:59 PM PDT by Chipper (You can't kill an Obamazombie by destroying the brain...they didn't have one to begin with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

each time ubama wanted to interrupt, or make a counterpoint in the debate, he would stand up. Except for this time. This time, he sat back and let it play out as he expected.


29 posted on 10/19/2012 3:48:40 PM PDT by grandpa jones (obama delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones

Interesting.... Good catch.


30 posted on 10/19/2012 3:49:37 PM PDT by TexasNative2000 ("You can either limit growth or limit government. We choose to limit government." Paul Ryan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000
Not to mention that this whole fiasco spins the Benghazi murders as an Obama issue, by enacting Crowley trying to cover up for Obama by lying.

Hmmm... Crowley. Fat, black pantsuit, hair extensions, apologizing for Benghazi.

Now WHO ELSE does that remind me of?

Fat, black pantsuit, hair extensions, apologizing for Benghazi...

I know - Ambassador Stevens murderer: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Ya'll are getting professionally mind***ked here:

Hillary-to-Crowley-to-Obama-Oh-My

And then there's that fat, black-pantsuit-wearing weathergirl that went on for four minutes last week, scolding the guy who wrote an email to her suggesting she was to fat to provide a good role model.

Naw, no connections here.

No neurolinguistic programming. No cognitively induced transference.

Zip.

Oh look, Hillary admitted to the murder.

And now back to Obama...

:: [crickets ::


31 posted on 10/19/2012 3:52:41 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grandpa jones

proceed governor....


32 posted on 10/19/2012 3:53:00 PM PDT by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

Let’s not miss CNN’s evident complicity. In the ensuing uproar over Crowley’s assist to Obama, CNN officially commended her for doing a great job and reiterated the obvious lie that neither candidate had the questions in advance. If they really cared about keeping neutral and keeping their good reputation, Crowley would have been fired before she left the studio.


33 posted on 10/19/2012 4:15:12 PM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

I hate it when, because people don’t pay attention, they force me to defend Obama. Crap. Ok, guys, the mod SAID HIS NAME FIRST, then obviously there was a cue person in the audience helping the candidates (live TV duh, they need that) because the SAME TIME Obama looked to his right, before he ever made a move, Romney also looked that direction, so it was obvious someone was directing them from the audience. Also, I thought that Kerry was “Carrie” or “Kari” referring to a female, and it looked kind if obvious to me that Obama thought the same thing. When he saw it was a male, he probably wanted to make sure it wasn’t “Terry”.

I’m not saying Obama didn’t know him or even know ahead of time he would be called on, but this explanation is plain silly and makes us all look like desperate conspiracy theorists... We have to stop wasting our time on crap like this and be a little more productive. Just my thoughts and opinion....


34 posted on 10/19/2012 4:28:32 PM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

It’s not just Kerry Ladka who was a plant. Nina Gonzalez, who asked the gun question, is apparently a registered democrat and works for the Obama campaign. There is a Katherine Fenton with Code Pink. People are trying to establish if the Katherine Fenton who asked a question at the debate is the same one. Everyone of the “undecided” questioners needs to be researched. The whole debate looks scripted.


35 posted on 10/19/2012 4:30:43 PM PDT by Mari2525
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

It’s not just Kerry Ladka who was a plant. Nina Gonzalez, who asked the gun question, is apparently a registered democrat and works for the Obama campaign. There is a Katherine Fenton with Code Pink. People are trying to establish if the Katherine Fenton who asked a question at the debate is the same one. Everyone of the “undecided” questioners needs to be researched. The whole debate looks scripted.


36 posted on 10/19/2012 4:30:43 PM PDT by Mari2525
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek
Crowley just HAPPENED to have the transcript.""""....

I believe Crowley KNEW exactly how this all looked that very night.

"Get the Transcript Candy" and she did, but she also knew she had been caught red handed after she PICKED UP that handy dandy Transcript so quickly and flayed it around.

Because, she immediately stated that what Mitt said was true.

She understod perfectly well what that Transcript in her hand disclosed about the SET UP.

37 posted on 10/19/2012 4:38:56 PM PDT by annieokie (O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fee

No matter the outcome of the election, Reince Priebus ought to insist upon a different debate scheduling process for 2016. The Commission is a Democrat/RINO hack disaster.


38 posted on 10/19/2012 4:45:33 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: x

“But if I understand correctly, Crowley said the questioner’s name, then the questioner said his name, so it wasn’t out of the question that Obama would be able to say the guy’s first name when he made his response.”

Crowley did say his name just before Obama said “Hi, Kerry”, but Obama had already started walking directly towards him before that, and Kerry hadn’t stood up or identified himself at that point. So, after Obama has already walked up to Kerry, heard his name, and greeted him by name while looking right at him, he then does the fake “look around for Kerry” thing, and says “what’s your name?”

That’s the sequence, and it’s way too fishy for me to write it off as not being a badly played setup.


39 posted on 10/19/2012 4:58:17 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Yes, I think she displayed some real obvious “guilty” body language when Obama put her on the spot, with the transcript in her hand. She must have realized how bad it looked, with the way that Obama whipped that line out cavalierly and pointed to her as if on cue. I’m sure they had arranged to do it differently, with her piping in on her own with a “fact check”, but Obama got overconfident and blew it.


40 posted on 10/19/2012 5:03:09 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson