To: jaypounder
I hate when politicians and people say, "I support the second amendment right for to people to hunt and..."
The second is NOT about hunting! It has nothing to do with sporting and everything to do with defending yourself and you God-given liberties against government encroachment.
2 posted on
07/28/2012 10:37:29 AM PDT by
Copenhagen Smile
(What if Jesus comes back like that?)
To: jaypounder; humblegunner; Slings and Arrows
"So what do you really know about your rights?"
For one thing, I know that nobody "gave" them to me as stated in your post.
I also know the difference between "your" and you're."
I also know I don't need to give you a hit with a teaser like this.
By the way, how's your Looney Bun, Benny?
3 posted on
07/28/2012 10:59:57 AM PDT by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: jaypounder
You need to go through that blog slowly, one word at a time, and proofread it. Glaring errors in spelling and composition might not be noticed by everyone, but they diminish the credibility of the author.
4 posted on
07/28/2012 11:03:30 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: jaypounder
Hey n00b! If you think your collection of words is worth reading, why did you excerpt?
5 posted on
07/28/2012 11:04:14 AM PDT by
MileHi
( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
To: jaypounder; shibumi
and how we are systematically loosing them rapidly. Loose the hounds!
6 posted on
07/28/2012 11:09:13 AM PDT by
humblegunner
(Pablo, being wily, pities the fool.)
To: jaypounder
Know your audience.
"If I asked you today, could you tell me what the Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments of the constitution) said or summarize it for me
could you?"
Fully three fourths (if not more) of the FReepers you are addressing could recite it for you verbatim. That means word-for-word for those of you in Spokane.
7 posted on
07/28/2012 11:11:13 AM PDT by
shibumi
(Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
To: jaypounder
8 posted on
07/28/2012 11:32:41 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: jaypounder
With all due respect, Jay, learn to write before posting more of your stuff.
For one thing, your column implies Americans fought the Revolution to protect the Bill of Rights.
Which of course did not exist till well after the end of the Revolution.
Oddly, your claim would be somewhat accurate if you expanded it. The Revolution was essentially fought to defend against what Americans saw as threats to their freedoms which were largely spelled out in the 1689 Bill of Rights as passed after the Glorious Revolution in Britain. I doubt one American in 100 is familiar with this original Bill of Rights, but those rights are what we fought for in the Revolution.
To: jaypounder
As Americans we have been given more individual rights through the US Constitution than any other citizens in this world have.
Not fair.
The UN has always been trying to ‘level the playing field’, not so much by trying to obtain more rights for others, but by trying to diminish the rights established for American citizens.
Wake up folks, this is the whole idea of the ‘one world government’ BS that both dhimmicrat and GOP politicians and presidents advocate. The UN is all about UN supremacy paid for with American contributions.
12 posted on
07/28/2012 1:06:50 PM PDT by
353FMG
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson