Second in a series of posts by David. .
There is no evidence Stanley was in Honolulu prior to 1963. All you have is a letter from Hawaii and it is false like much of the rest of the material received from corrupt Hawaii officials.
You have seen more that I ought to give you about the interview with Barry which was done when he was in Boston purportedly going to law school--in it he clearly says he went to Indonesia when he was two--that would be 1963. You can find other sources confirming that on Trowbridge's site if she hasn't taken them down.
Facts are Barry went to Indonesia in early 1963--it may be that Stanley took him but she was in fact in school at U of Hawaii in early 63 so she didn't stay long; she delivered him to the Soebarkah's. She didn't see him again until sometime after 1966 according to Lia, the housemaid.
No I am not going to provide you with citations to other sources you are welcome to look or to believe whatever you like. Again, the original record is there was never a child on capital hill at the Toutonghi's boarding house.
Barry has never provided any testimony that he left Stanley Ann behind in Hawaii when he was Indonesia. He has always maintained they went to Indonesia together.
Let's try that one on again. There were events where Barry in fact went to Indonesia with Stanley--probably more than one.
But the proposition here is this. When Barry was at Harvard, he gave an interview reported in several publications and in a wire story in which he says he went to Indonesia at age 2 which would be 1963.
But you also know that Stanley did start college at University of Hawaii at exactly that time in 1963 and attended continuously through 1966. No Barry seen anywhere in Hawaii with Stanley, her mother, or anyone else.
No pictures of Stanley and baby Barry. When Susan Blake saw her in August 1961 in Seattle on her way to New York, reason she didn't know how to change diapers on a two week old baby is because she wasn't the mother.
All that simple.
Second in a series of posts by David. .