Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's family fraudulent identity.
Myself | June 11, 2012 | Myself

Posted on 06/11/2012 5:41:04 AM PDT by plenipotentiary

Both Barack Obama II and Stanley Ann Dunham are invented personas.

A male child was born, probably son of Malcolm X and an unknown woman possibly Jo Ann Newman (per Martha Trowbridge). The childs father knew his days were numbered so to protect his only son he arranged with his Muslim and Communist contacts, to have him brought up in Indonesia under the protection of President Sukarno. He was a member of the Presidents extended family and under the direct protection of a high ranking Indonesian special forces officer, Pak Lolo Soetoro (which was probably not his real name). Soetoro did have a wife, and Obama believed her to be his mother, but she was not.

Sukarno was removed from power in March 1967.

In 1971, Obama II was moved to Hawaii, at that point the character of Stanley Ann Dunham was created (the birth certificate they use is illegible and that indicates that it does not support the created identity, and therefor everything after that in her story is also false) to allow a connection with communist agents, the Dunham family, and allow Obama II to be mentored in Communism by Frank Marshall Davis. The Dunhams probably had a son called Stanley Armour Dunham Junior (fate unknown). They initially changed the first names to Shirley Ann, and then ridiculously to Stanley Ann Dunham. SAD was never in Seattle, Why would she go to University there and take a night school or correspondance course)

Obama I was introduce briefy as Obama II's fake father. There probably was a real son of Obama I, but he was sidelined (maybe the Roman Obama who was stranded in KGB training school in Moscow)and the person we now know as Barack Obama II took his identity.

Obama II is a creature of the KGB and the Muslim Brotherhood, who both share aims to impose their way of life on the USA.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: birtherism; fraud; malcolmx; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamahistory; stanley; vettingobama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-450 next last
To: Fred Nerks
They do that all the way through both videos, they point to images but we still do not know what year they were from.

On the audio the woman says Stanley was there in 1959.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jgc3OzyuzMg#!

251 posted on 06/16/2012 11:20:40 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Is there anyone here who can take a screencap of the ‘Quillan Scroll in 1959’ which is being referred to here?

That should be "Quill and Scroll".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quill_and_Scroll
252 posted on 06/17/2012 3:13:19 AM PDT by HoneysuckleTN (Where the woodbine twineth... || FUBO! OMG! ABO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: HoneysuckleTN

QUILL & SCROLL! Now that makes sense...see #245 thru to #249 - I think that’s the capture from the video I was looking for. Nothing dated of course.


253 posted on 06/17/2012 4:18:14 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: ETL
...On the audio the woman says Stanley was there in 1959.

I think we have established that she possibly was there in the 1958-1959 school year. It's 1959-1960 that is in doubt. She probably graduated high school somewhere Class of 1960, but one image with a sweater and pearls does not a graduate of Mercer Island High School make...

254 posted on 06/17/2012 4:35:47 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

FOR THE RECORD - RELATED THREAD:

Was communist mentor intimate with Obama’s mother?
WND.com ^ | June 14, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi,

Posted on Friday, 15 June 2012 3:01:13 PM by Perseverando

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2895490/posts


255 posted on 06/17/2012 4:43:49 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

The ‘Quill and Scroll’ club would be 1958-1959 in order to be pictured in the 1959 edition of the annual as used by Maxine in the video. Yes, it is the 1959-1960 year that is missing in SAtanley Ann’s life story, conveniently. IF little barry bastard was born in August of 1961 then his mother became pregnant in the winter of 1960. IF, on the other hand, his mother became preggers earlier, while still a High Scholer, the liar-in-chief has yet another major deceit which he has been flouting.


256 posted on 06/17/2012 7:17:54 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Too bad the person who took the video didn’t show the front cover, and pages inside the front where there may have been a date.....


257 posted on 06/17/2012 7:32:42 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Aha, very good point. Perhaps because the dates don’t match the story. One would think that if the dates matched, they’d be shown. Maybe more info as well - names, places, etc.


258 posted on 06/17/2012 7:40:18 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks for the ping!


259 posted on 06/17/2012 9:18:37 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You’re welcome.

The signature on the bc at # 145 is similar to one of the many (forged/ falsified?) signatures we’ve seen over the years.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2893952/posts?page=145#145

Compare:

http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/07/25/top-fourteen-signatures-of-stanley-ann-dunham-obama-soetoro-doe/


260 posted on 06/17/2012 9:34:24 AM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Right click and save all those screencaps!

You can see some names on some of em.


261 posted on 06/17/2012 10:44:35 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Oh really? I copied directions on how to do screencaps yesterday but it was for Vista. I’m a techtard...


262 posted on 06/17/2012 11:09:45 AM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

oops, meant to say rightclick on the pix posted here...

Would love to know how to save vids using Linux


263 posted on 06/17/2012 1:24:27 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Gossip with each other sure. Speak to the national press, not so much.

Barack Sr *did* speak to a class at Punahou actually, when he showed up around Christmas 1970 after J E Hoover had died and the FBI file on F M Davis was finally closed.

I wouldn't be surprised if Barry took at least one year off between 5th and 12th grade, maybe a semester in Kenya, maybe he he went to San Francisco as an Indonesian exchange student. He may have been boarding at Punahou as a foreign Kenyan student for a while. I think any of this possible and if it were true I don't think the Punahou community would be talking about it.

264 posted on 06/17/2012 1:33:22 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
.I know it's important that you believe the image is genuine

You know something that is false? How is that? How many other false things do you "know"?

, she had to be there so she could graduate in 1960 and go to Hawaii to meet the black Kenyan native

She did? Why did she have to be there? What does this photo have to do with whether or not she fell in love with Barack Sr? Explain.

you don't know the origin of that image. You don't. But I do.

I think I understand why you might say that.

Because more information is better. With some information missing, yo could have a BS artist make stuff up about it.

What is the origin of the image? You seem sure it was photoshopped. Who photoshopped it? From what sources? Did you photoshop it? Why did you photoshop it? Is this a true thing you know, or another false thing you "know"?

265 posted on 06/17/2012 1:55:34 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
The image is from a Kim Screen of Washington state. She says the image is from her mother's yearbook.

Here is her blog post with the two images.

As far as I can tell she has provided no more context -- like the rest of the photo, the rest of the yearbook page, the captions, etc. And the images you've posted to the thread are the same as on her blog. Have you independently followed up to obtain more context such as the rest of the photo, the rest of the yearbook page, the captions, etc. ? If so, what information is there?

266 posted on 06/17/2012 1:59:44 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
The same girl also appears in the 'french club' image, though no year is given

This is incorrect. Kim Screen on her blog identifies the French Club image as "1958". This likely identifies the year of the yearbook, 1958, which would be Stanley Ann's sophmore year. Hope this helps.


267 posted on 06/17/2012 2:05:48 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

You are an amazing researcher. I find your comments on the thread extremely helpful.

Do you have any interest in investigating the claim that Stanley Ann did or didn’t graduate from Mercer Island HS? I looked into it and found what appeared to be overwhelming evidence that she did, so for me personally the matter is resolved. Probably for those who do not believe she graduated Mercer HS, no amount of evidence would suffice, so perhaps you needn’t waste your time.

Thanks for your posts anyway; they are impressive to say the least.


268 posted on 06/17/2012 2:18:10 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Plummz; Fred Nerks
She says the image is from her mother's yearbook.

You mean Marilyn Close?

Here is her blog post with the two images.

Fred showed us this a couple years ago. Do you have something new to show us?

If so, what information is there?

I don't think she's going to share that intelligence with you. ;-)
269 posted on 06/17/2012 2:19:34 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter
You are an amazing researcher.

Really? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2895490/replies?c=193
270 posted on 06/17/2012 2:26:49 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: David
the original Time article together with the cover was posted here a long time ago.

Could you cite, please? What issue? What did the cover look like? It appears this is something pulled from straight from your imagination.

Fred has given us a copy of a reprint;

If that is indeed the article you are referring to, it is an Associated Press article. It is not from Time magazine. Hence, there is no Time magazine cover. This cover you are seeing in your mind's eye is something that was invented by your imagination and that you have now confused with reality. You may want to check your other premises to see if you are confusing other things from your imagination with things from reality.

The version he told the interviewer

There isn't a direct quote, so it's hard to say what exactly he said and what the reporter guessed/made up from his notes.

The version he told the interviewer is that the prevailing view of when he went to Indonesia was not well understood

This is not a clear sentence. What are you trying to say here?

Spring quarter, 1963), Stanley starts school at the U of Hawaii and goes there until she goes to Indonesia in 1966--Barry completely absent from the record anywhere in the interim.

There is a picture of Barry in a kindergarten class in Hawaii at some point during those years. IIRC, there is also a statement from a Hawaii education department that his public school records were "lost." The latter isn't a record per se but a record of a record. The "lost" record probably contained some kind of birth information.

271 posted on 06/17/2012 2:29:29 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Read this old article by David Maraniss and compare it to the claims he now makes in his new book about Obama. Funny how things change. Reviewers currently credit MARANISS with finding records that Stanley Ann left Hawaii for Seattle within weeks of “her” child’s birth. And yet this older article repeats the lie that Senior left his wife and child behind in Hawaii when he left for Harvard 2 years after the birth: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/22/AR2008082201679.html?sid=ST2008082201770 The articl mentions the high school girlfriends, too.


272 posted on 06/17/2012 2:32:05 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Without a genuine birth certificate, you don’t know his birth date or the name of his parents.Or where he was born, for that matter.
So why assume she was his mother? Have you ever seen a photograph of the baby zero with a mother?


273 posted on 06/17/2012 2:33:04 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Yes, too bad...it’s the same smoke and mirrors as the factcheck photography of a forged Colb. It’s all done with snippets and shadows and not one single full page or anything that shows a date.
The only people who would believe the video content are those who want to or need to believe.


274 posted on 06/17/2012 2:35:51 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
...What is the origin of the image? You seem sure it was photoshopped. Who photoshopped it? From what sources? Did you photoshop it? Why did you photoshop it? Is this a true thing you know, or another false thing you "know"?

You sound like a raving lunatic.

275 posted on 06/17/2012 2:40:38 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

You got that right...chuckle


276 posted on 06/17/2012 2:45:13 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

What is the origin of the image? You seem sure it was photoshopped. Is this a true thing you know, or yet another false thing you delusionally claim to “know”? Who photoshopped it? From what sources? Did you photoshop it? If so, why did you photoshop it?


277 posted on 06/17/2012 2:55:48 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
Fred showed us this a couple years ago.

Why would he not post the information on this thread where it could be easily crossreferenced?

Do you have something new to show us?

That information is new to this thread. Now that it is here, others cannot as easily confuse the issue.

278 posted on 06/17/2012 2:58:12 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
It appears this is something pulled from straight from your imagination.

Like those big boobs that you imagined on Stanley Ann?
279 posted on 06/17/2012 2:59:52 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson

I am now under the impression that they are all counting on people having the attention span of gnats and the memories of blind moles that live in tunnels underground.
To a certain extent, Maraniss and Gilbert for example, are counting on that. They can claim ‘discoveries’ we discussed four years ago.
Who remembers the ATLAS SHRUGS article:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/how-could-stanl.html

....and the original ‘discovery’ of the exotic images of an UNNAMED girl, presented to the world as Stanley Ann Dunham, without any identification; simply on the basis of a slight resemblance? Images that were shown on a site, NOW WIPED, that I traced such a long time ago...FREE-VINTAGE-PORN.COM.

New and recent members show up on these threads filled with righteous indignation as if every word they utter is something new. Tiresome.


280 posted on 06/17/2012 3:23:29 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

Allow me. I didn’t identify the source of the tinted, textured images because I didn’t want anyone to associate the name of the classmates’s daughter with a possible not-genuine image.
But now you have, so thanks for that.

I expect the webpage will be removed shortly.


281 posted on 06/17/2012 3:34:35 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

I imagined no such thing, though you may have imagined that I did. Perhaps you are having similar problems distinguishing your imagination from reality?


282 posted on 06/17/2012 3:44:54 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I put two and two together and make that assumption. Why? Because she claimed to be his mother, listed him in her divorce pleadings, and for her entire life claimed to be his mother. I also freepmailed to you another piece of the puzzle that I don’t care to share on this open forum, so stop trying to goad me.


283 posted on 06/17/2012 3:49:39 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

I wouldn’t try to goad you, you would come down on me like a ton of bricks...LOL! I know you too well.

But think about this. There’s a man sitting in the WH and you don’t know who he is. So why assume you know who the child was that she was granted custody of?


284 posted on 06/17/2012 4:08:15 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
This is incorrect. Kim Screen on her blog identifies the French Club image as "1958". This likely identifies the year of the yearbook, 1958, which would be Stanley Ann's sophmore year. Hope this helps.

No.

Could be the second semester of her sophomore year (57-58) or the first semester of her junior year (58-59).

285 posted on 06/17/2012 4:58:23 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
Fred has given us a copy of a reprint; If that is indeed the article you are referring to, it is an Associated Press article. It is not from Time magazine. Hence, there is no Time magazine cover. This cover you are seeing in your mind's eye is something that was invented by your imagination and that you have now confused with reality. You may want to check your other premises to see if you are confusing other things from your imagination with things from reality.

I identified Fred's quote as the wire story. The magazine article is a more extensive interview which is also reported in a Harvard daily publication.

No, at this stage I am not really interested in going over research production with you--you are free to believe anything you like.

Timing of his trip to Indonesia is an important fact. In this interview, he says he went at age two which would be 1963 which is coincidentally when Stanley stopped being an Au Pair and started college at U of Hawaii.

So you take Rick Anderson's testimony that there was no baby with Anna on Capital Hill in 1961 and Barry's testimony that he went to Indonesia leaving Stanley in school in Hawaii--Stanley really doesn't look like the mother.

That is why his political advocates would like to eliminate those two facts because together, they are pretty clear testimony that Stanley was not his real mother. It isn't credible to believe that she was his mother under those circumstances.

286 posted on 06/17/2012 5:08:19 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson; Fred Nerks; LucyT; Brown Deer
The Washington Post article is mostly disinformation--a number of bad facts. I haven't read the new book.

The initial version of the Seattle/University of Washington story was set out in an article by the husband or ex husband of one of Barry's cousins in October of 08 in which he tells you straight out that the baby was left in Hawaii when the mother appeared in Seattle.

That story was rewritten because taken together with the birth in Hawaii in August story, it wasn't credible to believe Stanley would have done that had she been the real mother. The problem with the early version was further that there was no record of the baby in Hawaii--not with Senior; not with Stanley's family.

287 posted on 06/17/2012 5:22:53 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: David

Could be either, but likely the former. Could also be from 1957. Need more context — like the yearbook itself.


288 posted on 06/17/2012 5:25:56 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: David

Could be either, but likely the former. Could also be from fall 1957. Need more context — like the yearbook itself.


289 posted on 06/17/2012 5:26:17 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: David

And all this goes to show you is that revealing research results on these threads will guarantee that the holes we have uncovered are for-ever concealed. There goes the article written by the husband of the cousin...for example.

The water is filled with sharks here.


290 posted on 06/17/2012 5:37:05 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: David
The magazine article is

There is no Time magazine article. You are confusing something from your imagination with reality.

That is what the reporter says. We don't know exactly what Barry said to the reporter. Or if what he said was true.

when Stanley ... started college at U of Hawaii.

False. Stanley Ann started at U Hawaii in 1960 and then returned in 1963, according to U Hawaii records.

Rick Anderson's testimony that there was no baby with Anna on Capital Hill in 1961

Could you provide a cite to "Rick Anderson's testimony"? (Or is this strictly from your imagination along with the "Time magazine article"?)

Barry's testimony that he went to Indonesia leaving Stanley in school in Hawaii

There is no such testimony. Barry has never provided any testimony that he left Stanley Ann behind in Hawaii when he was Indonesia. He has always maintained they went to Indonesia together.

291 posted on 06/17/2012 5:51:14 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Fred Nerks

About the divorce papers. I’ve thought all along, and it was posited on threads, that SAD used a fake divorce to gain custody of the kid to take him to Indonesia.

But it looks as though the mother in the papers may have been the real Anna 0bama, getting custody of the child originally named Barack Hussein 0bama. The actual son of the Kenyan Sr. HMm.


292 posted on 06/17/2012 5:59:55 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: David; Plummz

What about the other pic?


293 posted on 06/17/2012 6:37:16 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: David

The article appeared here first: http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/obama-mystery-theater-his-ever-morphing-face/#more-13007


294 posted on 06/17/2012 7:25:57 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
when Stanley ... started college at U of Hawaii. False. Stanley Ann started at U Hawaii in 1960 and then returned in 1963, according to U Hawaii records.

There is no evidence Stanley was in Honolulu prior to 1963. All you have is a letter from Hawaii and it is false like much of the rest of the material received from corrupt Hawaii officials.

You have seen more that I ought to give you about the interview with Barry which was done when he was in Boston purportedly going to law school--in it he clearly says he went to Indonesia when he was two--that would be 1963. You can find other sources confirming that on Trowbridge's site if she hasn't taken them down.

Facts are Barry went to Indonesia in early 1963--it may be that Stanley took him but she was in fact in school at U of Hawaii in early 63 so she didn't stay long; she delivered him to the Soebarkah's. She didn't see him again until sometime after 1966 according to Lia, the housemaid.

No I am not going to provide you with citations to other sources you are welcome to look or to believe whatever you like. Again, the original record is there was never a child on capital hill at the Toutonghi's boarding house.

Barry has never provided any testimony that he left Stanley Ann behind in Hawaii when he was Indonesia. He has always maintained they went to Indonesia together.

Let's try that one on again. There were events where Barry in fact went to Indonesia with Stanley--probably more than one.

But the proposition here is this. When Barry was at Harvard, he gave an interview reported in several publications and in a wire story in which he says he went to Indonesia at age 2 which would be 1963.

But you also know that Stanley did start college at University of Hawaii at exactly that time in 1963 and attended continuously through 1966. No Barry seen anywhere in Hawaii with Stanley, her mother, or anyone else.

No pictures of Stanley and baby Barry. When Susan Blake saw her in August 1961 in Seattle on her way to New York, reason she didn't know how to change diapers on a two week old baby is because she wasn't the mother.

All that simple.

295 posted on 06/17/2012 7:36:34 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Plummz; Fred Nerks; LucyT; Brown Deer
when Stanley ... started college at U of Hawaii. False. Stanley Ann started at U Hawaii in 1960 and then returned in 1963, according to U Hawaii records.

There is no evidence Stanley was in Honolulu prior to 1963. All you have is a letter from Hawaii and it is false like much of the rest of the material received from corrupt Hawaii officials.

You have seen more that I ought to give you about the interview with Barry which was done when he was in Boston purportedly going to law school--in it he clearly says he went to Indonesia when he was two--that would be 1963. You can find other sources confirming that on Trowbridge's site if she hasn't taken them down.

Facts are Barry went to Indonesia in early 1963--it may be that Stanley took him but she was in fact in school at U of Hawaii in early 63 so she didn't stay long; she delivered him to the Soebarkah's. She didn't see him again until sometime after 1966 according to Lia, the housemaid.

No I am not going to provide you with citations to other sources you are welcome to look or to believe whatever you like. Again, the original record is there was never a child on capital hill at the Toutonghi's boarding house.

Barry has never provided any testimony that he left Stanley Ann behind in Hawaii when he was Indonesia. He has always maintained they went to Indonesia together.

Let's try that one on again. There were events where Barry in fact went to Indonesia with Stanley--probably more than one.

But the proposition here is this. When Barry was at Harvard, he gave an interview reported in several publications and in a wire story in which he says he went to Indonesia at age 2 which would be 1963.

But you also know that Stanley did start college at University of Hawaii at exactly that time in 1963 and attended continuously through 1966. No Barry seen anywhere in Hawaii with Stanley, her mother, or anyone else.

No pictures of Stanley and baby Barry. When Susan Blake saw her in August 1961 in Seattle on her way to New York, reason she didn't know how to change diapers on a two week old baby is because she wasn't the mother.

All that simple.

296 posted on 06/17/2012 7:38:48 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Greenperson; Fred Nerks; LucyT; Brown Deer
The article appeared here first: http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/obama-mystery-theater-his-ever-morphing-face/#more-13007

Well you know that's not the first place it appeared because what is there is a reprint of the Harvard Daily report. It was also reported in an AP wire story; he also got the magazine article on being editor of the Harvard Law Review and I believe that was the first place he told a reporter he went to Indonesia at age two. And although Fred is concerned about seeing this stuff get scrubbed which happens regularly when Barry is trying to hide his real story, this particular item is out there in a number of places.

Thus you get the kind of reaction to the facts you see here from his apologists. They would rather you not say that because it demonstrates that Stanley was not his real mother at all--initially she was just a glorified baby sitter.

Her role developed into something more than that--you can believe that she saw herself as sort of an adoptive mother.

But his true mother and her extended family in the US are at this point, a significant part of the effort that has made him a political figure. These people are being concealed for a reason.

True or not, his political supporters obviously believe that if the true story were known, it would render him an ineffective political leader. That is why they have spent so much money and gone to such lengths to conceal from America who he really is.

297 posted on 06/17/2012 7:49:52 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: David
...Thus you get the kind of reaction to the facts you see here from his apologists.

And thus, my continued hesitation/objection to posting anything from the combined research of a dedicated group, who have given so much time and effort. Thanks to all of you, you know who you are. And many thanks to the freeper who is storing the results off-site, and keeping it safe.

298 posted on 06/17/2012 7:59:28 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

“There’s a man sitting in the WH and you don’t know who he is.” Yet none of the elected congressional representatives seem to care! I agree, we do not know who this little barry bastard commie now occupying the WH is, but what is touted as his ‘history’ is as fake as a catdog. Stanley Ann had at least two children, but we have no clear proof that little barry bastard commie was one of them because a whole loty of money has been spent to erase any trail to the truth. We get snippets and pieces of a puzzle, but the profile this liar has presented is clearly fake yet there doesn’t seem to be enough to piece together the total picture of this lying democrat affirmative action shuck n’ jivin’ commie.


299 posted on 06/17/2012 8:02:57 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I doubt that I’ll read his book (Maraniss) but it’s fascinating to see how his subsequent works contradict previous works. I wonder if he corrects himself or somehow explains his errors or mistakes? One would think a thorough researcher would not make errors or mistakes of fact. Either he’s “helping” his friend Obama or he’s just a very bad fact checker. Used to be that journalists would cross check everything and have two or even three independent sources before something became “fact”. The story is all over the Internet in news and magazine articles, stating that Obama’s newlywed parents lived together, raising little Barry in Hawaii, for two years until SAD found out about the other wife and her husband took off for Harvard, leaving “Ann” and their baby behind. But then bloggers find the TRUTH that evaded this thorough researcher Maraniss and four years later he “finds records” that show SAD left for Seattle within weeks of the birth. Which brings me to the conversation you recently had with fantasywriter. It’s interesting that fantasywriter seems to believe that when something’s found in a lot of places on the Web, that makes it true. That’s not “evidence” because one source is copied from place to place to place. This “truth” that Senior and SAD lived together with Barry for two years is everywhere, and yet—it’s not true and it’s not evidence to find multiple places that reported a false “truth”. I’ve seen no independent evidence, for example, that Stanley Ann Dunham graduated from Mercer Island High School in 1960. Proof would be a graduation photo that wasn’t photoshopped. I’ve never seen her in cap and gown. Has anyone?


300 posted on 06/17/2012 8:13:04 PM PDT by Greenperson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-450 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson