I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?
[ I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that? ]
He is but he wants the states to decide for themselves cause that is what the constitution prescribes
I think it's a copout under the cirumstances.
Ron paul is a rules-based libertarian. That’s why you can’t trust these types to make the right decisions in cases like this. Paul is hard-wired and programmed and is not always capable of analysis or even reasonable thought.
” had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?”
Ron Paul isn’t as pro-life as he led some of us to believe; in fact, he has a mixed recordon abortion:
“Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)
Rated 56% by the NRLC, indicating a mixed record on abortion. (Dec 2006)”
snip http://www.issues2000.org/Ron_Paul.htm#Abortion
Paul is not pro-life if you look at his actual voting record and not listen to what he says.
Ron Paul's votes must always be framed in his unique (and not necessarily incorrect) view of the Constitution. His vote always needs such an asterisk. This is NOT in support of his vote, BTW>
Roe V Wade needs to go and the FedGov needs to stop interfering with the States ability to ban abortion.
Anything else requires an Amendment.
he is a libertarian first pro life second.