Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ElIguana

I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?


4 posted on 06/01/2012 12:09:31 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertarianLiz

[ I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that? ]

He is but he wants the states to decide for themselves cause that is what the constitution prescribes


9 posted on 06/01/2012 12:25:28 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz
No but the link explains it.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?379007-Let-s-be-Honest-Why-Ron-Paul-voted-against-on-H.R.-3541

I think it's a copout under the cirumstances.

10 posted on 06/01/2012 12:27:56 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

Ron paul is a rules-based libertarian. That’s why you can’t trust these types to make the right decisions in cases like this. Paul is hard-wired and programmed and is not always capable of analysis or even reasonable thought.


28 posted on 06/01/2012 1:20:29 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

” had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?”

Ron Paul isn’t as pro-life as he led some of us to believe; in fact, he has a mixed recordon abortion:

“Voted NO on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)

Voted NO on making it a crime to harm a fetus during another crime. (Feb 2004)

Rated 56% by the NRLC, indicating a mixed record on abortion. (Dec 2006)”

snip http://www.issues2000.org/Ron_Paul.htm#Abortion


29 posted on 06/01/2012 1:28:28 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

Paul is not pro-life if you look at his actual voting record and not listen to what he says.


31 posted on 06/01/2012 1:36:54 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz
I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?

Ron Paul's votes must always be framed in his unique (and not necessarily incorrect) view of the Constitution. His vote always needs such an asterisk. This is NOT in support of his vote, BTW>

33 posted on 06/01/2012 1:49:10 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Extraneous Wind sends ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz
Nope. But, where in the Constitution does it give the FedGov the power to have ANY say in this whatsoever?

Roe V Wade needs to go and the FedGov needs to stop interfering with the States ability to ban abortion.

Anything else requires an Amendment.

46 posted on 06/01/2012 5:06:28 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz

he is a libertarian first pro life second.


59 posted on 06/01/2012 5:26:41 PM PDT by Donnafrflorida (Thru HIM all things are possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: LibertarianLiz
I had thought that Ron Paul was pro-life. Was I wrong about that?

Cut and Run has never been pro-life. He is the one who demanded that an underage girl be allowed to cross state lines in order to get an abortion when it was illegal in the state she lived.
77 posted on 06/01/2012 6:33:40 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson