Breitbart was a gutless coward on eligibility from the very start. Why the strange desire to make him into some kind of Birther martyr?
Breitbart was a gutless coward?
I won’t say what I wish for you.
“Breitbart was a gutless coward on eligibility from the very start. Why the strange desire to make him into some kind of Birther martyr? “
I’ve hear people like you, armchair warrior nobodies, call everyone gutless cowards (Rush, Levin, Brietbart) because they don’t talk about the BC 24/7.
As soon as you do 1/1,000,000,000th as much for conservatism that these guys have done, get back to us, eh?
The strange desire to be a birther martyr? - First, I’m not trying to make him into a “birther martry”. Second, I reject your use of the term “birther” as I’m a CONSTITUTIONALIST. Third, with all of Brietbart’s contact with Sheriff Joe’s Investigative Posse do you not think it plausible that Brietbart was waiting for HARD, SOLID evidence before going out on that limb. ALL of us that have come forward thus far have been attacked on the issue mercilessly. I don’t think that ALL of those with a voice in the media have been silent precisely because they didn’t understand, or didn’t agree. I understand the motto; “Live to fight another day”. And, I understand the meaning of “getting all your ducks in a row”.
I had long been worried about a LOT of the so-called conservative media and their unwillingness to bring up the subject (some I still am worried about, but their actions and beliefs don’t determine mine).
I also believe I understand more now of what some people were saying - that his ineligibility is NOT enough, not because it’s not enough under our laws, but because we are playing a worldwide game of chess and the issue of Obama’s eligibility is just one part of the whole (it’s only one chess piece, and the ones in charge of the game see him as only a pawn).
Also, in case you haven’t noticed, it’s EXTREMELY hard to get ANY of Obama’s supporters to even LOOK at the evidence, much less look with an open mind. Hence, why the big picture is becoming more important (not that Obama’s ineligibility has become LESS important mind you).
Do I believe Obama is ineligible - no doubt in my mind that he is NOT who he says he is, and that nearly all of his “official” papers are forged, or tampered with, or *hidden* in some way, hence that Obama is NOT a lawful President of these United States. The thing I’m worried about now is that the Communist interests across the world are going to USE this crises to gain a foothold in the US and Obama is stupid enough to LET them thinking it will somehow protect HIM personally... (see upcoming “war games” with China and Russia - the plot of the Russian “game” is a lot like the original “red dawn”, except they’ve added Chinese destroyers and other Chinese military vessels to the game).
I don’t think we have enough TIME to ferret our way out of the eligibility issue at this point. Obama’s fake BC, Selective Service record, etc... is quickly becoming “small potatoes”, but I by no means dismiss it.
As for Brietbart, I would like to believe - seeing as he had met with Sheriff Joe who HAS hard evidence is that the eligibility issue was one of many Andrew was going to hit Obama over the head with this election season. Even if he DIDN’T believe the Communists/Socialist/Radical Islamist Troika had somehow tampered with records to make Obama *appear* eligible on the surface, Brietbart exposed SO MUCH of the OTHER issues we as a country are facing that I don’t think he’s someone to dismiss precisely BECAUSE he didn’t venture into the field of Obama’s eligibility. It could be because he knew others were covering it in-depth and he may have made the estimation that his time was better spent investigating the numerous other anomalies, and people around him. I don’t think we can read Andrew’s mind - especially now that he’s gone, nor can we guess what he believed while he was alive.
One more thing to consider - do you think, had he come out strong on the “birther” issue, that he would have opened or closed more doors to information on Obama? If most of Obama’s followers think that those of us concerned about eligibility are a bunch of loons (which we ARE NOT), but if they think we are, then are they even going to bother sitting down with someone who supports and talks about that theory? My point being - could he have gotten an interview with Ayers, etc... if he HAD been really outspoken on the eligibility, or was he able to fly a little closer to the radar precisely because he didn’t?
Like I mentioned - this is a HUGE chess game, and everything relating specifically to Obama would disappear were he to be gone, but the organization, the networks, the big picture are ALL still there whether we get rid of Obama or not.
[PS - New puppy HAS to go outside, so it will be a bit, and I haven’t had time to adequately edit/proof this post.]
Because less than 5 hours before he died Andrew Breitbart was on the phone with Joe Arpaio telling Joe that he was glad Joe was going to present that evidence to the public because it was convincing.
Soros had already threatened the alphabet-media heads if they reported on eligibility, and the media heads had passed it on the on-air personalities as threats to their careers, possibly lives, and possibly family members’ lives. But that didn’t include Breitbart. Breitbart had refused to get on the birther bandwagon because he believed we would never get access to records that could actually prove anything. And until we had law enforcement involved that was somewhat the case. To have Breitbart reverse himself and use his own company to get Arpaio’s evidence out there.... would have been devastating to Obama’s cover-up.
Breitbart had to go. The moment he heard Arpaio’s evidence and affirmed it as convincing and valuable for the world to know.... he signed his own death warrant.
Just an interesting aside here. I’ve commented that Breitbart’s company refusing to address only the eligibility issue indicates what issue Breitbart was really assassinated over. So now Breitbart has apparently been threatened into not addressing the other stuff either. That makes it appear a little less obvious that it was the eligibility issue that he was assassinated for. But Breitbart didn’t decide to keep quiet on the other stuff until after it was noted that what they were really keeping quiet on was the eligibility issue.