Because less than 5 hours before he died Andrew Breitbart was on the phone with Joe Arpaio telling Joe that he was glad Joe was going to present that evidence to the public because it was convincing.
Soros had already threatened the alphabet-media heads if they reported on eligibility, and the media heads had passed it on the on-air personalities as threats to their careers, possibly lives, and possibly family members’ lives. But that didn’t include Breitbart. Breitbart had refused to get on the birther bandwagon because he believed we would never get access to records that could actually prove anything. And until we had law enforcement involved that was somewhat the case. To have Breitbart reverse himself and use his own company to get Arpaio’s evidence out there.... would have been devastating to Obama’s cover-up.
Breitbart had to go. The moment he heard Arpaio’s evidence and affirmed it as convincing and valuable for the world to know.... he signed his own death warrant.
Just an interesting aside here. I’ve commented that Breitbart’s company refusing to address only the eligibility issue indicates what issue Breitbart was really assassinated over. So now Breitbart has apparently been threatened into not addressing the other stuff either. That makes it appear a little less obvious that it was the eligibility issue that he was assassinated for. But Breitbart didn’t decide to keep quiet on the other stuff until after it was noted that what they were really keeping quiet on was the eligibility issue.
I think your post is an excellent companion to my response (see #80 - my apologies for not pinging you as I did forget).
I AM convinced that it WAS this issue that he was getting “too close” to. It’s the bedrock issue that WILL undermine all of Obama’s personal power, but I’m also considering that taking Obama out of the picture is NOT enough (as I’m sure you see too). We have to expose ALL of them, but this issue might just do it - or might at least give the US more time to expose the bigger plans. (I keep switching NOW between is it enough - or isn’t it? I have long spoken about and believed that this was an essential piece, but as I’m putting together more of the pieces, it is a “pawn” piece which tells you just how bad this *game* that they are playing really is.)
The thing is, where the media and publicity used to protect whistle-blowers or fellow journalists they are now in the business of protecting their chosen political agenda and truth be damned. One “downside” of the “new media” is the the “old media” COULD try to paint Brietbart as another one of many “bloggers”, but thank God he was at least too well-known for THAT ploy to work in regards to his legacy.
over here ...
I agree with everything except this one point. In the case of the coroner dying of arsenic poisoning, that is not subtle. People don’t ingest arsenic by accident and very rarely on purpose. Perhaps the Zero team is getting a wee bit nervous, and/or want to be more obvious to instill fear in more people.
"Breitbart had to go. The moment he heard Arpaio’s evidence and affirmed it as convincing and valuable for the world to know.... he signed his own death warrant."
Breitbart spent all of 12 minutes on the phone with Arpaio. If Breitbart was so interested in Arpaio's evidence, why did he have no plans to attend Arpaio's news conference?
Just listen to Breitbart.com's Ben Shapiro. He makes Grima Wormtongue look like a piker.