Looks like your involuntary is your strongest argument, yet still weak on known facts, Zimmerman’s lack of “police training”, for instance, O’Mara could let a first year associate handle the light lifting.
I don’t doubt your possible attack plans, it’s just the known evidence is on Zimmerman’s side.
Our Esteemed Prosecutor has a different view of the evidence. He maintains that police told Zimmerman 'not to follow but he did' and that there was 'no evident significant injury to Zimmerman'. See link in post #79 above.
You could very well be correct when it comes to a conviction. If I were the Defense Atty I would really hammer away at the fact that Zimmerman had broken off the pursuit and was jumped from behind. Indeed, that is the only defense he has ... but it could be a good defense if I could find the facts to support that theory.
Again .... probable cause is light years different from “beyond a reasonable doubt”.