Our Esteemed Prosecutor has a different view of the evidence. He maintains that police told Zimmerman 'not to follow but he did' and that there was 'no evident significant injury to Zimmerman'. See link in post #79 above.
I could be way off, it looks like he’s giving us his version of a little peek at the prosecution’s way of thinking.
The thing is, the prosecution is not interested in the facts of the case at all, because it appears the facts favor the defense. They are only interested in how few they can get away with being introduced.